Understanding Agents

Principal

The law states that one who is a principal has a fiduciary duty owed to him by an agent. The agent receives this duty by being appointed by the principal. The purpose behind the appointment is for the agent to carry out special tasks on hand in which they are specialized.

In return for a fee, the agent must perform his duties to the best of his ability in order to satisfy not only his principal, but also the guidelines of the law. The law that describes the ethical standards and duties of an agent towards his principal are located within the State laws as well as previous court opinions.

Power of Attorney

Power of Attorney is granted through the consent of the principal given to the agent. The agent has the ability to be able to perform various duties which do not conflict with the interests of the principal since there is a fiduciary obligation. The agent must abide specifically to the terms set forth in the contract.

All You Need to Know About Common Law Governance of Contracts

Contract law is based in three different areas. The first, and rarer, basis for contract law is a specific statute governing a contract. The second area is the Uniform Commercial Code. The more pervasive foundation of contract law is common law. Common law is not written down or codified in any particular place. Common law is instead the tradition of law in a particular jurisdiction.

Common law as it reflects on contract law is influenced by the findings of British common law in effect at the time of the American Revolution in 1775. The common law decisions that have been handed down by individual states since British common law ceased to be the governing principle of the location and any relevant finding by a Federal judge.

Common law is a general term for any legal precedent that is taken from a judge’s individual ruling. The main statute which provides the foundation of English common law is based on the interpretation of the 1677 Statute of Frauds. It has been incorporated into the common law heritage of all fifty states in the United States at some point.

The main concern in a common law system regarding contracts is if one party is allowed to sue another person. Contract law in a common law system calls this idea the concept of privity of contract. In contract law, privity answers the question of whether an individual party has the legal standing to sue another party, as well as what the responsibility is of the party being sued. Privity in contract law says that rights cannot be extended to an individual who has not entered into the contract in question, and that a third party not involved in the contract has no liability for the terms of the contract.

Privity is a complicated but essential aspect in contract law in common law systems. The 1968 English case of Beswick v. Beswick examines the complications when two parties enter into a contract to provide for the welfare of a third party. The elderly Mr. Beswick and his nephew created a contract in which Mr. Beswick sold his company to his nephew. One of the terms of the contract was that Mr. Beswick’s would-be widow, Mrs. Beswick, be provided with stipend after Mr. Beswick’s death.

The nephew agreed to the contract, but after the death of his uncle declined to provide the stipend. The nephew claimed he was under no obligation to provide the stipend because his aunt had not been involved in the original contract. The court in this case upheld the nephew’s contention. However, because Mrs. Beswick was the administrix of his estate, and thus a party to the contract because the estate maintained an interest in the contract he was still compelled to uphold the terms of the contract.

Outside of circumstances such as that in Beswick v. Beswick where the third party assumes the interests in one of the original parties, the only other time a third party can become directly involved in a contract under the concept of privity inherent in a common law system is when one of the original parties to the contract has been acting on behalf of the third party from the beginning.

For instance, John is working for Joe. Joe and Jack enter into a contract. John would then be able to compel Jack to fulfill the contract because the duties in a contract can be transferred. If Joe were not working for John, John would be unable to force Jack to complete the contract.

In Depth Overview of Principal

When an individual receives the authority to act on behalf of another, they are known as principal agents. A principal gives the authority, by way of investment or contract, to the principal agent. A contract is arranged in order to set up the guidelines on how the agent acts on behalf of the principal.

An example of a principal-agent relationship is how the shareholders of a corporation are investing within the entity, while the entity performs its duties of raising profits and becoming more productive. The principal in this situation are the shareholders, and the corporation acts as the principal agent. The shareholders may cancel the contract at any time, but while they are the principals, they elect officials within the corporation through a voting system which they have been given the right to do.

An issue may occur based on the conflict of interest between the two parties. An example being, if the corporation needs to take one route for its benefit, and at the same time, the stock of the corporation may go down, which negatively affects the interests of the shareholders.

There is no set goal on which the principal may be satisfied since they are hiring an agent in order to do what they specialize in. The agent in this case is to perform to his or her maximum ability in order to satisfy the principal. The only way the principal may feel dissatisfaction is if their interest within the agent depreciates.

A principal agent has a fiduciary duty towards the principal. The duties of an agent include the following: (1) To perform the tasks specified within the terms of the contract to the best of their ability, while the principal agents do not have the authority to perform acts on behalf of the principal that are not stated within the agreement; (2) An obligation to relieve his obligations with due diligence and care; (3) The duty of avoiding any conflict of interest, not only between the two parties specified in the contract, but also any conflict which they may incur even though it is not stated within the agreement.

A principal agent is not to perform any additional duties which may conflict with a prior obligation to which he or she has committed. The main issue within the principal agent relationship directly involves the lack of full disclosure. The principal has the duty to update the agent on any information which relates to the transaction or the tasks the agent has on hand. The agent must do the same, and the agent has an extra obligation of not increasing his interest without increasing the principal’s. If an agent is acting on behalf of a principal, the agent must make sure the increase in interest between the two is relative.

Uncover the Functions of Contract Law

Contract law has been construed historically that if ambiguous language is employed, then the contract will be interpreted in such a way as to give favor to the party that signed the contract, not the party that wrote the contract. Contracts law is derived from a common law heritage.

Another major function of a contract is to document what each party to a contract is obligated to do for the other. Contract laws also serve to assign consequences in the event either party is unable to perform the duties taken up under the terms laid out in the original contract.

Contracts law is also meant to uphold the basic processes by which the economy functions in the United States and in all countries throughout the world, though not every country has a common law basis for understanding contract law.

Contract law in other systems may have a heritage derived from civil law, Islamic law, socialist law, and/or from tribal law. Depending on each country’s specific views of contracts, law systems in the country may assign more protection to the consumer or may afford more protection to the corporation.

Understanding the Power of Attorney

When a principal agent relationship is created based on an arrangement of a contract, the power of attorney rights are automatically conveyed to the agent. The power of attorney held by the agent, is clearly specified within the contract on how to act on behalf of the principal. The agent in this case may also be referred to as an attorney-in-fact. The term attorney-in-fact has been implemented to decipher between them and attorneys of the law. The fact is represented by the fiduciary duty labeled based on the facts of the contract arranged.

The power of attorney is usually stated separately from the contract. This is due to the fact that others are to be shown that the agent has the right to act on behalf of his or her principal. Although the general power of attorney may be either written or oral, most entities require it to be in writing. When an attorney-in-fact, the agent has to be completely loyal and honest with his or her principal. There are many examples of principal agent relationships within real property law.

Power of attorney is granted to a real estate broker to place offers on a house, when the principal is buying; or when accepting an offer on behalf of the principal, when the principal is the seller. An attorney becomes the agent when overlooking and creating the various contracts required, since the principal may not have the knowledge to do so, hence he relies on the attorney while the attorney is being compensated.

General power of attorney can be granted in most circumstances. For each industry, there are specified state laws regarding the guidelines on the ethical and procedural behavior the power of attorney must abide by. Each agent within various industries, are specialized, that is the benefit of why principals seek agents to perform their duties based on credentials and competence. The power of attorney will automatically be revoked upon the death of the principal, or if he or she become mentally ill.

The only exception to such revocation is if it is clearly stated within the contract, that the agent was granted a “durable” power of attorney, in which there is no revocation involved. Majority of the time, it is more than beneficial for the agent to have insurance when catering to fiduciary duties towards others. This is in case the principal feels as if there was a breach of contract in where the agent had performed acts which were not specifically stated within the contract. The outcome would be a lawsuit in which in the best interest of the agent is to obtain insurance covering his or her agent responsibilities.

What are the Objective Theory of Contracts

Reasonable outside observer would adhere. The law of contract prohibits the enforcement of contracts that appear to be too good to be true. Business contract law serves to prevent outrageous claims from being enforced. This interpretation of the law of contracts is known as the Objective Theory of Contracts.

The Objective Theory prevents the interpretations of any law of contract from enforcing ridiculously out-sized claims in advertisements as the offer of a contract. The most famous example of this in business contract law is the Pepsi Harrier Jet case. In a 1995 TV commercial Pepsi offered a Harrier jet as a reward for its Pepsi points customer give away.

The ad said that the jet could be obtained for 7 million points. While the main method of obtaining Pepsi points was to drink Pepsi brand soda and redeem points from bottle caps, the company also allowed points to be purchased for ten cents each. John Leonard thought he saw a brilliant business opportunity.

The normal cost to obtain a Harrier jet was in excess of $23 million dollars. If Leonard bought all the points he would have needed to redeem for the jet it would cost him just $700,000. After raising money from friends and family, Leonard bought 7 million Pepsi points.

Attempting to enforce what he thought was a valid law of contract, he sent the 7 million points he had purchased, as well as 15 Points he had obtained from other means, and an order form on which he demanded that Pepsi supply him with a Harrier jet.

In response, the company wrote him a letter giving him free coupons and a letter which claimed that business contract law did not oblige the company to provide the jet because it was obviously an outlandish claim, meant to be humorous and entertaining. Leonard took Pepsi to court, claiming that the advertisement of a Harrier jet for the 7 million Pepsi points he had purchased was a valid offer.

Leonard said that when Pepsi did not reward him with the jet it had violated the law of contract. He claimed that by mailing in the points he had accepted their offer, the 7 million points were his consideration, and that the jet constituted Pepsi’s consideration.

In rejecting Leonard’s claim, the judge laid out the Objective Theory of Contracts succinctly. The judge ruled that business contract law had not been violated because “no objective person” could have believed in good faith that the offer was serious.

Due to the outrageous nature of the advertisement, the law of contract was determined to not have been violated. Business contract law is bound by a reasonable person test, that is, would a reasonable person examining the contract determine that the terms of the contract were realistic.

Interpreting Contracts At A Glance

One of the essential tenets of business contract law is that the terms of the contract must be one to which a When interpreting a contract there are several things that an arbiter or jury must examine. The first is to determine the intention of the parties to the contract. There are many ways to do so including the plain-meaning-rule.

When determining intent, the judgment must conform itself to the intent of the parties and must be alert to times when the parties’ intents deviate from the what would normally be expected. An interpretation must also seek to not reward fraudulent intentions which may have been held by a party to the contract.

Important Facts You Need to Know About MentalIncompetency

Being mentally incompetent deals with the inability to perform a duty or understand it. Illiteracy is not a type of mental incompetency since you are not limited mentally. Rather you lack the knowledge to be labeled literate. Mental incompetency may be related to various disorders and illnesses. An example of a disorder which may be deemed excusable by contract law could be one in which an individual suffers extreme ADD or has totally lost touch with their environment.

According to contract law, if the nature, purpose, and consequences are not fully understood due to the lack of mental capacity, the contract is voidable on the discretion of the mentally incompetent individual. Contract laws tend to define mental incompetency as lacking the capacity needed to undergo a legal process.

By a court of law, one is deemed mentally incompetent when diagnosed as mentally ill, mentally retarded, senile, or suffering from some other disability that prevents them from managing their own affairs. A guardian is appointed in order to aid the mentally incompetent in carryout out their personal and legal affairs.

There are three steps which lead to the determination of labeling an individual as mentally incompetent and excusing them from their duties to contract laws. The first is the motion for a competency hearing. The second is a psychiatric or psychological evaluation. Third, there is a competency hearing.

Most motions need to be filed prior to the sentencing. In this case, it would mirror that which occurs with the motion for a competency hearing. These hearings tend be granted “if there is a reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent” (18 U.S.C.A. § 4241 (a)).

Once that is complete, the court appoints a psychiatrist or a psychologist to evaluate the individual who has been subjected to mental incompetency. The appointed individual implements various psychological tests and investigations in order to deem a person competent or incompetent.

Following these two steps, the competency hearing determines the mental capacity of the individual to understand their obligations within a contract. Once all is said and done, either the contract is enforced or the individual is excused from his obligations, and is admitted into a hospital for a period of four months to evaluate whether or not the individual may be able to reacquire his or her competency.

Contract law also deems individuals who, when entering a contract while intoxicated, as being able to void a contract due to the lack of awareness regarding the nature, purpose, and consequences of the contract. If legally incompetent, a marriage contract may also be annulled based upon insanity, legal age, mental incompetence, and a preexisting marriage.

Regarding contract law, one of the most delicate contracts to validate are wills. When a will is being drafted and goes through the court process of probate, deciphering between the intent of the will and what appears on it may involve complications. The complications may arise from individuals who persuaded the testator to write something within the will or a beneficiary party acting upon behalf of the testator himself. This is why the mental competency of the testator needs to be determined when the will is being enforced.

All You Need to Know About Corporations

A corporation, also referred to as an invisible hand, lacks no legal capacity since authority is granted to buy and sell real property. A corporation formed through state statutes, therefore, has jurisdiction within just the state unless there is a location of the corporation within another state. Since a corporation is an entity whose operations are performed by representatives, the authority of the corporation entering the contract, is performed by the representatives themselves by signing and accepting the contract on hand.

In order for business contracts to be validated and completed, the representatives must receive the consent of the board of directors. You will never see one representative having the authority to complete business contracts for a corporation, there are checks and balances involved due to the size and legal compliance of a corporation in deeming business contracts.

The reasoning behind such checks and balances in the contract process is due to the interest of the amount of shareholders, directors, employees, creditors, and the community that receives direct impact based on the direction a corporation leads toward. There are five defining factors of a corporation; each factor plays a unique role in the formation and advancement of the corporation.

(1) It has separate legal characteristics, meaning representatives of the corporation may will not be subjected to anything against the corporation unless committed upon personal interests.

(2) Limited liability of the stockholders, meaning if bankruptcy occurs, stockholders are limited to receive what they initially inputted.

(3) Being able to transfer shares through the stock exchange, this allows shares to bought, sold, or traded on the consent of the stockholder.

(4) There is a delegated group of managment, also known as the board of directors, whose consent is needed whenever initiating a task on behalf of the corporation.

(5) Interest of shareholders, which gives shareholders a piece of ownership of the corporation through their investments.

When an investor owns shares within a corporation, there needs to be some sort of perk involved other than collecting dividends off their stocks, which allows for the development of a sense of importance. Shareholders not only have the rights to dividends declared by the company, but they also have voting rights when there is a survey figuring out which direction to head in or what improvements may be enacted. They also have the rights to any return of capital upon advancement or bankruptcy of the corporation itself.

All in all, a corporation consists of the highest value out of all the forms of business in our modern times. A corporation is the only form in which the representatives are completely protected from being liable on behalf of anything the corporation itself is charged with, even within the business contracts realm.

This is primarily due to the fact that there is not one sole decision maker within the firm that may enforce the contract. Each decision on behalf of the corporation involves a body of individuals which hold authority with, and against each other. This is to promote the checks and balances the corporate figures hold over each other.

Contracts