Facebook
Home Contract Law

Contract Law

Simple Guide to Verbal Contracts

Simple Guide to Verbal Contracts

In the
United States, verbal contracts will usually refer to unwritten or oral
contracts. An unwritten contract will usually mean that the contract or
agreement was made through the use of spoken words as opposed to formally
writing and entering into record the provisions of said contract.

The United
States has laws that will recognize verbal contracts in a court of law and
enforce the agreed upon provisions in the case of a dispute. However, because
verbal contracts are oftentimes unwritten contracts, there will be inherent
problems involved in a legal dispute surrounding verbal contracts.

The most
common issue which arises is that verbal contracts are extremely hard to prove
to have ever actually occurred in the first place. Evidence such as witnesses
and an overall preponderance of evidence will be necessary to prove that a
party violated verbal contracts. Therefore, it can be deemed that unwritten
contracts, as opposed to formally written contracts, are not weighed as heavily
or given the same legal merit in a court of law due to the lack of actual
physical evidence of the contract.

All You Need to Know About the Roman Law

All You Need to Know About the Roman Law

What is Roman law?

Roman law was the formal legal system of ancient Rome; Roman law accounts for the legal developments that occurred before the seventh century AD. During this period, the Roman-Byzantine state adopted Greek as the official language for the governing bodies of the land. 
The development of Roman law took more than a thousand years of jurisprudence, for it evolved from the Twelve Tables to the Corpus Juris Civilis, which was ordered by Justinian 1. 
The Justinian Code, a formal Roman law that arose from the aforementioned jurisprudence, served as the basis for legal procedure throughout continental Europe, Ethiopia and the majority of former colonies of European nations. 
Development of Roman law:
Before the Twelve Tables were formulated, private law in Rome was comprised of civil law and was applied only to Roman citizens. The earliest formation of Roman law was bonded to religion with distinct attributes related to formalism, conservatism and symbolism. This foundation of a legal field was predominantly governed by the ruling king; the majority of citizens lacked fixed rights under this framework. 
The first formal text of Roman law was developed through the Law of the Twelve Tables. The Law of Twelve Tables was created in the middle of the fifth century BC; TerentiliusArsa, a plebian tribune, proposed that Roman law should be affirmed in writing, to prevent magistrates from applying arbitrary laws. 
After years of political struggle, the plebian class convinced the patricians to form a delegation and meet in Athens, to affirm the laws of Solon through written documentation. In 451 BC, ten Roman citizens were chosen to record the laws; during this process, the men were given supreme political power—a transferring of power that ultimately restricted the authority of the magistrates. 
In 450 BC, the decemviriproduced laws on ten tablets; however, these laws were regarded as a meager attempt by the plebians. A second decemvirate then added two additional tablets in 449 BC; this new law, the Law of the Twelve Tablets, was subsequently approved by the people’s assembly. 
Early Roman law:
Following the creation of the 12 tablets, Roman law began to formulate itself into the ruling framework over the land. Many laws of the 12 tablets ultimately created a modernized society that effectively managed the behaviors of citizens through the institution of an affirmed legal code. 
Early Roman law consisted of numerous laws that ultimately formed a balanced society; for instance, laws were created to allow the marriage between plebeians and patricians—a fundamental law that effectively agglomerated society through the destruction of social barriers. Another important statute of early Roman law is regarded as the root for modern tort law; LexAquilla, the name of the statute, provided compensation to the owners of property that was injured by another citizens’ fault or negligent actions. 
Arguably the most important contribution that early Roman law possessed was not the enactment of statutes, but the emergence of a class of jurists and the creation of a legal science. 

Offers Explained

Offers Explained

According to U.S. legal theory, advertisements are not generally considered offers in the sense of being legally binding and applicable toward the establishment of contractual agreements. As such, offers which do possess legal force under the theory and practice of contract law must include, among other things, an individual whom is specifically targeted and can accordingly be identified as an “offeree”. 
Additionally, advertisements are excluded from the legal definition of offers due to their absence of another component: legally binding terms included in the offers. Advertisements, to this end, may be identified under legal terminology not as
offers but, rather, as invitations. 
Advertisements are thus not offers in their most basic form, but may possibly be designated as such if additional terms are added to the advertisement, such as offering special incentives for people to take advantage of a service. Otherwise, advertisements cannot be litigated in the same way as offers.

Deed Poll

Deed Poll

A deed poll is a type of legal document that only involves a single person or party, and which states a particular intention that such a person is bound to by the document itself. A deed poll itself is not a contract due to the fact that only one party is affected by such a legal document and it states only an intention, rather than a guarantee or promise. This kind of document is oftentimes referred to as a deed poll name change because it is very commonly used in order to enact a name change for an individual. 
Change name by deed poll is most commonly used in Europe, particularly in England, Ireland, and Northern Ireland. Other nations such as Hong Kong and New Zealand also use the deed poll name change.
Typically speaking, to change name by deed poll will require that a person complete a form, which must be signed by a witness. The form is then filed with the appropriate court. In many jurisdictions, deed poll name change may be considered as a legal name change, though change name by deed poll may not necessarily change a person’s name on the birth certificate. 
Therefore, in the case that a passport is to be obtained, for instance, both the birth certificate and the change name by deed poll document will need to be furnished in order to complete the passport requirements.

Contractor Explained

Contractor Explained

What is a Contractor?
A contractor is an individual or company who is responsible for the day-to-day operations and oversight of a construction site. In addition to these functions a contractor will also manage the transactions involved in the site, primarily trades and deals with vendors.
A contractor is also responsible for keeping touch with the general contractor and the involved parties involved throughout the course of the project. 

Price Evaluation Process:
Before starting a construction project, a contractor must visit and assess the construction site. Upon evaluating the piece of property, the contractor will formulate a price, referred to as an estimate. The contractors will then evaluate the cost of all materials, equipment, as well as the cost of labor. After analyzing the expected cost of the project, the contractor will provide the owner of the building with an approximate price for the construction process. 
Following the delivery of the expected price for the project, the contractor will draw up contracts. These contracts will elaborate on the budget and the conditions revolving around the plans and specifications of the project. The contractor will utilize a design professional, such as an architect, to better evaluate the necessities of the project. That being said, in the majority of construction sites, the contractor will also act as the project engineer or the project manager. 

What is a Contractor Responsible for?
A contractor is responsible for providing the construction companies and the individual workers with all material, including labor, equipment and those services necessary for the construction of the project. In order to accomplish these tasks, the contractor will incorporate specialized subcontractors to perform specialized tasks or portions of the construction process. 
The responsibilities of the contractor will vary depending on the size and complexity of the construction project. In general; however, a contractor will be responsible for providing or accomplishing the following tasks: filing for building permits, securing the property, managing the workers on site, providing temporary materials and utilities on site, providing engineering functions and surveying for the site, disposing of wastes left over by the construction process, monitoring the schedules of workers, balancing the costs of the project and maintain accurate records regarding the finances and the construction process as a whole.


Example of a Contractor’s work:
An owner of a building or a real estate developer will develop a program based on their needs and subsequently choose a site. An architect will then assemble a design team of engineers and other experts to design the building and pinpoint specifications needed for construction. During this phase, the contractor will frequently participate in the design efforts by providing services where they will aid in providing price estimations and information revolving around scheduling. 
The owner, contractor and architect will then work closely together to meet the deadline and budget of the project. The contractor will work with subcontractors to ensure that all quality standards have been met, in addition to the budget and timeline.  

Easy Guide to Contract Law

Easy Guide to Contract Law

What is a Contract Law?
 
Contract Law is the legal field that undertakes the regulation, establishment, and oversight of legislation pertinent to contracts; contracts are defined as legally binding agreements whose expressed legality upon construction is required in order to substantiate the authenticity of the contract itself. A contract will typically include at least 2 entities who must agree to participate within the expressed stipulations and terms illustrated within the text of the contract. A legal contract will typically include 4 primary components:
An ‘Offer’ is the initial provision of the terms expressed within the contract
‘Acceptance’ is the agreement enacted by both parties with regard to participate in the contract
A ‘Counteroffer’ is an acknowledgement of the terms expressed within the contract – a counteroffer is not synonymous with the endorsement of a contact
The ‘Consideration’ is the identification of valued items that may be used as collateral in the event of a breached – or broken – contract
What is an Illegal Contract?
 
The precepts within Contract Law define an illegal contract as a contractual agreement deemed to be absent of the required satisfaction of legal statutes necessary for the contract to be viewed as legal. Within contract law, contracts may be deemed as illegal due for the following reasons:
The inclusion of a minor as a party to the endorsement or creation of a contract is considered to be illegal; as a result of their legal rights and liberties – in accordance with their respective age(s) – a minor is considered to be ineligible to endorse a contract
Contract Law states that the forced endorsement of a contract, which is defined as the participation in either the construction or signing of a contract under duress or threats imposed renders the contract to be illegal
Contract Law states that contracts or agreements including the implementation or involvement of products, services, or activities considered to be illegal within the jurisdiction in which the contract was constructed or endorsed is rendered as an illegal contract
Contract vs. Agreement
 
Although the definitions of the two terms tend to become blurred both through misuse, as well as varying terminology, the precepts of contract law express that a contract and an agreement are not synonymous. While a contract may include a variety of agreements within its content, the primary difference between a contract and an agreement lies in the fact that the failure of one – or both parties – to adhere to the terms expressed within an agreement will typically be unable to result in legal action or punitive recourse. Conversely, the violation of the terms of a contract – upon that substantiation of that contract’s legality – may be subject to legal action or punitive recourse.
Contract Law Trials and Hearings
With regard to the legal review of contracts, Contract Law will oftentimes integrate the statutes expressed within tort law; a tort is derived from the French word meaning ‘wrong’ with regard to a wrong suffered by or upon an individual in conjunction to the involvement of another individual or entity:
Upon review of a broken – or breached – contract, the precepts of contract Law implements the legal procedure in which individual responsibility and action is classified and weighed without the mention or facilitation of a binding and legal contract
The analysis of any or all respective liability and participation is evaluated through litigation, case review, and witness testimony with regard to a broken or breached contract

Understand Your Rights As An Employee

Understand Your Rights As An Employee

What are Employee Rights?
Employee rights are the personal freedoms and privileges given to individuals who work in the United States, as well as other developed nations. Employee rights are affirmed through employment laws; in a general sense, employee rights are awarded to working individuals to protect their interests and safety in the workplace. 
The most basic and fundamental employee rights will offer the working individual the right to time off work, to contribute work without harassment, and the right to receive minimum as well as overtime pay. Those individuals who work and who do not receive such employee rights possess the ability to file lawsuits against their respective employers. If found guilty of violating these basic employee rights, the underlying employer will be forced to provide the respective employee with monetary compensation and punitive damages. 
Employee rights take the form of both state and federal laws; each individual state posts its own minimum wage scale that must abide by the federal scale enacted by the United States government. Employee rights regarding overtime, although up to the discretion of the particular employer, must also meet the federal guidelines instituted by the United States government.
All employees, except for those exempt such as salaried supervisors, are entitled to compensation for hours worked beyond the hours required in the individual’s particular employment contract. 

Minimum Wage:
Another fundamental employee right is the right to earn a minimum wage. It is illegal, based on employee rights and coordinating employment laws, to pay individuals below the federal and local minimum wage level. No state may pay employers below the national minimum wage right, although the potential for workers in the service industry to collect tips, does enable an employer to pay a wage lower than the national level. 


Time off Work:
Employee rights mandate that all employers allow their respective employees to take time off from work. The reasons for requesting time off can include the need for a vacation, family emergencies or medical leave. Regardless of the reason, an employer must satisfy this basic employee right; the amount of time off will vary based on company and the stipulations which elucidate on time off will be documented in the employment contract. 

Workplace Rights:
All employees possess the right to enjoy a workplace that is free from harassment. Basic employee rights will protect workers against sexual harassment or harassment fueled by age, race or gender discrimination. If a worker is being harassed, the individual has the right to file claims with an administrative body to initiate the filing of a civil suit. 

What You Need to Know About Contract Templates

What You Need to Know About Contract Templates

Contract templates are used by many companies so that the company only has to have a contract drafted and examined by a lawyer or legal professional a single time. If the contract template is examined and declared to be legally valid and capable of standing up to close inspection or in a court of law, the contract template may then be used to create future contracts in as effective and efficient manner as possible in terms of both the time and money that is required to create a contract between different and additional groups. 
However, since a contract template may make use of boilerplate language, there is a danger that if the contract templates do not make the contract template’s terms easily accessible and comprehensible, the contract template may not be considered valid and might result in a party that disputes a contract that develops from the contract template. 
Contract templates are available for almost any conceivable contractual situation. A contract template may be produced by specific corporate contract software programs, or a contract template may also be used to create contracts from other templates in other, commonly available software programs and products.

Contract Law Defined

Contract Law Defined

Contract law is defined as the body of law that governs oral and written contracts.  Included in contract law are topics on the nature of contracts, limitation of actions, breach of contract, termination of contract, and many more.  Put simply, contract law deals with the legal issues surrounding the formation, duration, breaching, or termination of contracts.  
For example, the Uniform Commercial Code is used in contract law to harmonize the law of sales and commercial interactions in the United States.  This Code is used in almost every state and is considered the standard in most states regarding laws on the sale of goods.  The Uniform Commercial Code is a long-standing act in contract law, a collaboration between the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute.


Breach of Contract
One of the most prevalent subjects in contract law is the idea of a breach of contract. A breach of contract is a legal concept characterized by one or more parties failing to honor the provisions stated in a contract.  For example, if an employee signs a non-compete agreement with an employer and begins his or her own company after being fired, he or she can be sued for breaching the contract.  Breaches of contract come in four main types:

Minor Breach
A minor breach of contract, also referred to as an immaterial breach, occurs when the non-breaching company is entitled only to compensatory damages.  

Material Breach
Unlike a minor breach, a material breach allows the non-breaching party to collect damages and a court-obligated performance of conditions stated in the contract.

Fundamental Breach
A fundamental breach, also referred to as an anticipatory repudiation, is a breach of contract so tangible that it may allow the non-breaching party to terminate the contract.  The party is then entitled to also sue for damages.


Anticipatory Breach
An anticipatory breach, also known as anticipatory repudiation, is when one party indicates that it will be unable to perform as the contract states, or that future non-performance is unavoidable.  In this case, the anticipatory breach may be treated as an actual breach and the non-breaching party can then sue for damages.
Avoiding a breach of contract is important for many different reasons.  For example, breaching a contract can lead to legal fees, a damaged business reputation, and damages.  These damages may include:

Compensatory damages
Compensatory damages are damages used to compensate for losses in order to bring the non-breaching party back to the position before the breach.


Nominal damages

Nominal damages are awarded when a breach occurs with no measureable financial loss.

Punitive damages
Punitive damages are made to the non-breaching party whose payment can extend beyond the financial losses of the breach.  They are meant to punish “wrongful acts” and are not specially aimed to remedy breaches of contract law.

Liquidated damages
Liquidated damages are identified by parties in the contract itself.
In addition to damages, a breach of contract may also bring specific performance or cancellation and restitution.  In specific performance, the court orders that the breaching party perform duties written into the contract.  In cancellation and restitution, the non-breaching party receives damages and is entitled to cancel the contract, voiding its terms.

Enforcing a Contract

To collect these remedies for breaches of contract, parties usually turn to small claims court.  However, going to small claims court can cost a significant amount of time and money in court appearances and court fees.  Many times, the parties will choose to go in another direction.  In these cases, a dispute may be brought to mediation or arbitration. 

Lawsuit
In most cases, the non-breaching party will sue for damages in small claims court.  A lawsuit can result in a number of remedies for the breached contract, including damages, specific performance, and cancellation and restitution.  A lawsuit can provide damages that will provide the non-breaching company with remedy for the breached contract, especially if it is measurable by the court.

Mediation
Mediation involves both parties working with a mediator to find ways to resolve the contract dispute.  A mediator is responsible for finding a solution that works for both parties.  Mediation allows the parties to minimize risk and control costs.  

Arbitration
Arbitration is similar to mediation in that there is a third party reviewing the dispute.  However, since arbitration is mandatory and legally binding (most of the time), many people will choose to undergo mediation instead of arbitration.

Privity of Contract Explained

Privity of Contract Explained

Privity of contract is a legal
doctrine that holds that a business contract, along with any other type of
contract, may not confer rights or impose obligations to any person or agent
except for the specific parties that have formed the contract.

Privity of contract is most
commonly an issue which arises during business contracts that have been formed
to allow for the sale of goods or services. Horizontal privity of contract
becomes an issue when the benefits bestowed by a contract are given to a third
party or a party that was not a part of the original contract. Vertical privity
of contract involves an independent contract that develops between one signer
of the original contract and another individual or other legal entity.

There are certain circumstances
under which privity of contract may be set aside which will allow the legal
entity who is not directly a part of the business contract to be allowed to sue
to force a party to the original contract to uphold their obligations. Privity
of contract will only allow a third party to the contract to go against one of
the original parties to the contract beyond the ability to collect the third
party’s entitlement to a benefit under the contract.

123...5Page 1 of 5
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X