Home Contract Law

Contract Law

Quick and Easy Contract Law Cases

Quick and Easy Contract Law Cases

 

 
Contract law cases can be classified under the general law of obligations. The general category of the Law of Obligations includes Torts Law, Unjust Enrichment Law, and Restitution Law, besides Contracts Law.
 
 
One of the most famous contract law cases is the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. Although this case of contracts law is included in English contract law cases, the relevant principles of contracts law in the English system were adapted to the American courts.
 
 
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is one of the most famous contract law cases since it involved a manufacturer who offered a flu remedy called a “carbolic smoke ball.” The makers of the smoke ball, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, advertised in a newspaper that buyers who developed the flu despite using the smoke ball properly would be given 100 Pounds as a refund. 
 
 
The Company claimed that the advertisement was not a serious offer, but the judges in the case ruled that because there was a statement from the company that they had deposited money in an account so that they would be able to make the payments if there were any claims, a reasonable person had cause to believe that there was a sincere offer, thus meeting the requirement that there be an offer and acceptance to form a contract.

 

Government Files Lawsuit against Fluor Companies

Government Files Lawsuit against Fluor Companies


On November 8, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that the United States government is intervening in a case against Fluor Corporation and its subsidiary, Fluor Hanford Inc, after the Texas-based companies used federal funds for lobbying activity.  The lawsuit for violations of the False Claims Act was first filed by a whistleblower, Loydene Rambo.  


According to the Justice Department, Fluor had a contract with the Department of Energy (DOE) for multiple services at the Hanford Nuclear Site in Washington State between 1999 and 2008.  The facility is federally funded.  


According to the original complaint, part of the DOE contract stated that Fluor could not use the federal funds for lobbying.  The whistle blower’s complaint alleged that Fluor used the funds for lobbying from 2005 to 2008 anyway.  The company hired two lobbying firms, Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC, to lobby members of Congress and federal agencies.  


The United States has agreed to intervene in the case against Fluor, but the government will not intervene in cases against Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC.  Since Ms. Rambo filed the lawsuit under the False Claims Act, she can share a percentage of the recovery with the United States government.  


Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, stated: “The taxpayer money Congress allocated for this program was for training federal emergency response personnel and first responders, not to lobby Congress and other for more funding.  When public funds are misused, as alleged in this case, the Justice Department will work to restore them to the Treasury.”


The Civil Division of the Justice Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Washington are handling the case and receiving assistance from the Department of Energy Office of Inspector General.  


Source: U.S. Department of Justice
 

Important Facts About Breach of Contract

Important Facts About Breach of Contract

What is a Breach of Contract?
A breach of contract occurs when a party, who agreed to formulate a contractual obligation with another party, does not carry out the intended function of the contract. As a result, a breach of contract is a legal cause of action where the binding agreement latent in the contract, is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract. 
A breach of contract can result in an individual not carrying-out a specific performance that was expected by the contract or by interfering with the other party’s ability to perform the task. 
If a party, who agreed to formulate a contract with another party, does not fulfill his or her contractual promise or has given information to the other party that he or she will not perform his expected duty as labeled in the contract, the party is said to have performed a breach of contract. In addition, if the individual is unable to perform the obligations latent in the contract for whatever reason, a breach of contract is present. 

Types of Breaches:
Minor Breach of Contract: A minor breach of contract constitutes a party’s inability to perform the full task expected by the contract; a minor breach of contract is referred to as an immaterial or partial breach of contract. In these instances, the non-breaching party cannot sue for specific performance, and can only seek legal action for actual damages sustained. 
Material Breach of Contract: A material breach of contract is realized through any failure to perform, which ultimately permits the other party to the contract to collect damages because of the breach or compel performance. 
Fundamental Breach of Contract: A fundamental breach of contract is a breach that permits the aggrieved party to terminate performance of the formulated contract. In these scenarios, the non-breaching party is entitled to sue the breaching party for damages sustained. 
Anticipatory Breach of Contract: A breach of contract through anticipatory repudiation is an unequivocal indication that the party refuses to undertake the project or deliver performance as stipulated in the contract. Included in this type of breach, is a situation where a future non-performance is inevitable. This type of breach of contract allows the non-breaching party the option to treat the breach as immediate, which ultimately allows them to terminate the contract and sue for damages, without waiting for the actual breach to take place. 

Remedies of a Breach of Contract:

In most instances, the judicial remedy for a breach of contract is the delivery of monetary compensation for damages incurred. If the failure to perform or satisfy the contractual obligation cannot be redressed through monetary compensation, the underlying court may enter an equity decree, which will award an injunction or the delivery of a specific performance. 
The aggrieved person possesses the obligation to mitigate damages through reasonable means. In the United States, under contract law, punitive damages are typically not awarded for a breach of contract but may be awarded for other causes of action in a lawsuit. 

What are the Legal Actions To Take Against A Breached Trust

What are the Legal Actions To Take Against A Breached Trust

A breach of trust can occur in any number of circumstances, and in
each case there may be a differing form of legal recourse. When the breach of
trust is included with a breach of contract, there may be both legal and civil
penalties. 

 

For example, if there is a breach of contract between a day care
center and a parent, it may also include a breach of trust. If the day care
center took responsibility to care for a child and then failed to do so, they
may be charged with both breach of contract and breach of trust.

 

The result of those activities may influence whether or not the
charges are criminal or civil. If, for example, the child was injured because
of a failure to care for that child as promised, the charges would likely be
civil and criminal.

 

Contract In Depth

Contract In Depth

A contract is a legal document which may be enforceable by legal action or by binding arbitration. In order for this to be true, however, the contract agreement must meet several important requirements. 
There must be a compensatory remedy for the contract under which the party which defaults is required to pay monetary compensation that would have otherwise been provided had the contract agreement been upheld, or an equitable remedy, which can also be called Specific Performance. The equitable remedy, or specific performance, compels an individual who enters into a contract agreement to carry out the action against which they have attempted to renege on their obligation. 
In order for a contract to be valid, the contract must involve unqualified, or “mirror”, acceptance. In order for a contract agreement to be valid, all parties must have the capacity to contract, and the terms of the contract cannot be trifling, indeterminate, or impossible. In the eyes of the law, a contract cannot be entered into to compel illegal action.
Although a contract is usually written in order to compel action, a contract agreement can also be created which will prevent a person from performing an act which they have the legal capacity to perform.
If a contract agreement is breached, legal remedies may be provided to address that breach.
Contract law, the legal field that specializes in the legal disposition of contracts and contract agreements, generally adheres to the Latin motto “pacta sunt servana,” meaning “pacts [agreements] must be kept.”

What Are Contracts

What Are Contracts

What is a contract?
 
 
A contract agreement is a legally binding agreement that is reached between two parties under which the two parties to the contract agree to assume an obligation to each other and provide methods of remediation through the courts in the event there is a dispute about whether or not each party upheld their obligation. 
 
 
Contracts law cases 
 
 
Contracts law is one of the major sections of common law. Some of the most prominent contract law cases have been developed over the past several hundred years. The most prominent and influential of these contract law cases have been compiled to create the Restatement of Contracts.
 
 
Meeting of the minds
 
 
A meeting of the minds is one of the essential elements of forming a valid contract. Meeting of the minds means that both parties to the contract have agreed to the terms of the contract. It can be difficult for the courts to determine if a meeting of the minds has been conclusively established. 
 
 
Deed poll
 
 
A deed poll is a legal document that binds a single party to take an action. It is different from a contract in that while a contract expresses a promise, a deed poll only expresses an intention to act. A deed of poll is commonly used in England, Wales, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Hong Kong, and Singapore. 
 
 
Contract templates
 
 
Contract templates can be used to form a general contract. A contract template may also be used to ensure that the terms of the contract are equitable to all parties involved. 
 
 
Offer and acceptance
 
 
The underlying concept behind contract law is pacta sunt servanda. Pacta sunt servanda is a Latin phrase which is translated as agreements are to be kept. However, this only applies to legally valid contracts. One of the main methods of determining when a contract is valid is by determining if offer and acceptance has taken place. In the eyes of the law, the offer and acceptance is only valid if there is not a change to the offer and acceptance is unequivocal. 
 
 
Consideration 
 
 
Consideration is the item of value that is exchanged in a contract. Contract law is not concerned about whether or not the consideration being exchanged is of equal value. All that matters is that the consideration cannot be inconsequential.
 
 
Contract termination
 
 
A contract termination letter template can be an important resource for a company since it can help to make sure that the contract termination letter is legally valid and does not violate any laws when the contract termination letter is served. The contract termination letter should provide the reason the contract is being terminated, as well as the legal justification for the contract termination. 
 
 
Boilerplate contract
 
 
A boilerplate contract, adhesion contract, or standard form contract are all synonymous terms for a contract in which the terms of the contract are drafted ahead of time. Part of the controversy behind a boilerplate contract or adhesion contract is that it may not be possible to access the terms of the contract before signing the contract, since it may be on a “take it or leave it” basis. 
 
 
Sample contracts 
 
 
Sample contract forms can help individuals form a boilerplate contract, although standard contracts may also be formed from contract forms for the sale of goods, to create employment contracts, or to create a standard contract that can be used with minimal customization and involvement of lawyers.
 
 
Uniform Commercial Code 
 
 
The Uniform Commercial Code, abbreviated as the UCC, is a legal document that is meant to serve as a guideline for states to align with their contract laws in order to facilitate commerce. In one form or another the Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted in all fifty states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, Louisiana has not adopted Article 2 of the UCC. 
 
 
Contract software
 
 
Contract software to create free contract templates can be found widely online. These free contract templates can be used for personal or commercial business. Contract software can be distinct products or may be add-ons to existing software. 
 
 
Contract vs. agreement
 
 
While a contract forms a binding relationship between two parties, an agreement involves a relationship that cannot be enforced by the courts. Contracts outline the obligations that are being assumed, although contracts outline the remedies if these obligations are not met. 
 
 
Restatement of Contracts
 
 
The Restatement of Contracts is a widely respected legal treatise. The Restatement of Contracts is compiled by the American Law Institute. 
 
 
Privity of contract 
 
 
Privity of contract is the concept that only the two parties that form business contracts can sue to collect benefits from the violation of a contract.
 

Contract vs. Agreement

Contract vs. Agreement

The essential differences between a contract and an agreement are minor. In essence, a contract’s outline is more formal and more rigidly presented than the terms outlined in an agreement.
A contract is a legally binding agreement reached between two parties, the terms of which the courts have the authority and obligation to enforce. An agreement is a less formal creation of an obligation between the two parties.
An agreement usually lacks one or more of the essential elements that are required to be present in order to form a valid contract that will be considered legally enforceable by a court of law.
Contracts outline the terms of the relationship that should be formed between the two parties to the contract. An agreement also outlines the terms of the relationship between the two. However, the difference is that the contract’s outline is far more rigid than that of a contract.
The essential difference between an agreement and a contract is that typically an agreement will only modify a contract that is already in place but does not place an obligation on either one of the parties to provide consideration to the other party, which a contract requires. A contract can involve the exchange of promises between the parties to the contract, while an agreement may simply involve one party accepting the offer from another party.

Simple Guide to Verbal Contracts

Simple Guide to  Verbal Contracts

In the
United States, verbal contracts will usually refer to unwritten or oral
contracts. An unwritten contract will usually mean that the contract or
agreement was made through the use of spoken words as opposed to formally
writing and entering into record the provisions of said contract.

The United
States has laws that will recognize verbal contracts in a court of law and
enforce the agreed upon provisions in the case of a dispute. However, because
verbal contracts are oftentimes unwritten contracts, there will be inherent
problems involved in a legal dispute surrounding verbal contracts.

The most
common issue which arises is that verbal contracts are extremely hard to prove
to have ever actually occurred in the first place. Evidence such as witnesses
and an overall preponderance of evidence will be necessary to prove that a
party violated verbal contracts. Therefore, it can be deemed that unwritten
contracts, as opposed to formally written contracts, are not weighed as heavily
or given the same legal merit in a court of law due to the lack of actual
physical evidence of the contract.

What Can A Contract Software Do For You

What Can A Contract Software Do For You

Contract software can provide
free contract templates for individuals to use when, in the course of their
business or personal dealings, they encounter the need to form contracts. In
addition to purchasing contract software for the express purpose of creating
contracts, in many cases companies are able to obtain free contract templates
online in order to accomplish their contract creation needs. The contract software
that is used may be customized for use by a company, or the contract software
may simply be used as they are originally obtained.

Free contract templates may be
used to create a standard form contract, which are also known as a boilerplate
contract or an adhesion contract. Whether paid or free, contract templates can
save an individual or enterprise substantial amounts of time, cost, and effort
that would otherwise be associated with the creation of a contract.

Contract software can be
drafted using free contract templates to help facilitate the use of contracts
and services. Contract software which an individual or enterprise obtains can
make use of free contract templates in order to allow the party that is
drafting the contract and then offering the contract to the other party, a
resource which can help them to make the contract more likely to stand up to
scrutiny in a court of law, as well as making sure that the free contract
templates which they use will provide for their particular needs.

Verbal Contract V. Written Contract

Verbal Contract V. Written Contract

Contract law in the legal context of the United States generally allows for a contract which is called into being by the exchange of verbal expressions to be as valid as one which is set forth in writing. This general provision for a verbal contract may, however, be modified in certain jurisdictions by specific contract law requirements for a contract to be set down in specific circumstances and toward specific ends. Moreover, contract law for an area may or may not provide for the difficulties which can arise in carrying out a verbal contract. 
The lack of a written contract can present problems in terms of the lack of proof as to what was agreed to under contract law. As such, judges administering contract law may be forced to apply a standard of fairness in order to resolve the contract dispute. In this way, a verbal contract, while valid, may not be effective.

Attorneys, Get Listed

X