A contract termination letter template may be used by a company in order to ensure that they terminate any contract in which they are currently in a method that will completely avoid further complications which can cause further disputes.

A contract termination letter template can be created to create an employment contract termination letter, a business contract termination letter, or a construction contract termination letter. These three contract termination letter types are the most common, which means that one of these three contract termination letter templates is most likely to be encountered or needed.

The essential elements to include in a contract termination letter are the names and specifications that can be used to identify the party to the contract who is receiving the contract termination letter. The contract termination letter should contain an opportunity to refer to the terms and conditions that were present in the original contract that empowers the party to terminate the contract.

If the contract termination letter involves a contract that requires the party breaking to contract to provide monetary compensation for breaking the contract, it is essential that the contract termination letter mentions how the payment will be provided.

A contract termination letter must include the code under which the individual gains the authorization to terminate the contract. This restriction primarily applies to a contract termination letter provided by a company to an employee. 

A contract termination letter should be completely professional.

A quasi-contract is a fictional contract that was created by courts to promote equitable treatment. As a result of this definition, a quasi-contract is not an actual, legally-binding document, but instead a legal substitute for a contract that is formed to impose equity between two distinct parties. 

The basic concept of a quasi-contract is that a contractual agreement should have been formed in situations where such an agreement was not realized. The quasi-contract is thus used when a court system feels as though it is appropriate to create an obligation to avoid an injustice and to promote equality between two parties. 

In most cases, the actual existence of a real contract is required for a defendant to be held liable for services rendered; however, in many jurisdictions throughout the United States, under certain circumstances, a plaintiff may be entitled to seek restitution under a quasi-contract.

The basic elements of a quasi-contract require three fundamental principles. The first element is that the plaintiff furnished valuable goods or required specific services to be rendered with a reasonable expectation of being compensated if the defendant breached or failed to meet these expectations. Secondly, the defendant must knowingly have accepted the aforementioned goods and obtained a direct benefit through this acceptance. 

And lastly, the defendant must receive benefits by the goods or services that are regarded as unfair in situations where the plaintiff received no compensation.

In a standard, legally-binding contract, both parties agree to the stipulations of the deal and the surrounding subject matter, to affirm the agreement and to make the contract binding, the parties enter into an oral or written agreement prior to exchange of goods or services. 

In a quasi-contract; however, one of the parties does not intend to enter the contract. Even though mutual assent is not achieved, the court can decide to create a contract to promote fairness between the two parties. 

In most instances, a quasi-contract is created when disputes over payments of goods or services arise between two parties. When these situations arise, the remedy for a quasi-contract is typically limited to whatever is necessary to prevent the presence of unjust enrichment obtained by one of the parties. 

This typically means, in regards to the creation of a quasi-contract, that damages are restricted to the cost of the plaintiff’s materials and labor. In these situations, profits are excluded on the grounds that it is unfair for a party who did not want to enter a contract to pay the profits to the other party. 

The essential differences between a contract and an agreement are minor. In essence, a contract’s outline is more formal and more rigidly presented than the terms outlined in an agreement.

A contract is a legally binding agreement reached between two parties, the terms of which the courts have the authority and obligation to enforce. An agreement is a less formal creation of an obligation between the two parties.

An agreement usually lacks one or more of the essential elements that are required to be present in order to form a valid contract that will be considered legally enforceable by a court of law.

Contracts outline the terms of the relationship that should be formed between the two parties to the contract. An agreement also outlines the terms of the relationship between the two. However, the difference is that the contract’s outline is far more rigid than that of a contract.

The essential difference between an agreement and a contract is that typically an agreement will only modify a contract that is already in place but does not place an obligation on either one of the parties to provide consideration to the other party, which a contract requires. A contract can involve the exchange of promises between the parties to the contract, while an agreement may simply involve one party accepting the offer from another party.

Roman law was the formal legal system of ancient Rome; Roman law accounts for the legal developments that occurred before the seventh century AD. During this period, the Roman-Byzantine state adopted Greek as the official language for the governing bodies of the land. 

The development of Roman law took more than a thousand years of jurisprudence, for it evolved from the Twelve Tables to the Corpus Juris Civilis, which was ordered by Justinian 1. 

The Justinian Code, a formal Roman law that arose from the aforementioned jurisprudence, served as the basis for legal procedure throughout continental Europe, Ethiopia and the majority of former colonies of European nations. 

Before the Twelve Tables were formulated, private law in Rome was comprised of civil law and was applied only to Roman citizens. The earliest formation of Roman law was bonded to religion with distinct attributes related to formalism, conservatism and symbolism. This foundation of a legal field was predominantly governed by the ruling king; the majority of citizens lacked fixed rights under this framework. 

The first formal text of Roman law was developed through the Law of the Twelve Tables. The Law of Twelve Tables was created in the middle of the fifth century BC; TerentiliusArsa, a plebian tribune, proposed that Roman law should be affirmed in writing, to prevent magistrates from applying arbitrary laws. 

After years of political struggle, the plebian class convinced the patricians to form a delegation and meet in Athens, to affirm the laws of Solon through written documentation. In 451 BC, ten Roman citizens were chosen to record the laws; during this process, the men were given supreme political power—a transferring of power that ultimately restricted the authority of the magistrates. 

In 450 BC, the decemviriproduced laws on ten tablets; however, these laws were regarded as a meager attempt by the plebians. A second decemvirate then added two additional tablets in 449 BC; this new law, the Law of the Twelve Tablets, was subsequently approved by the people’s assembly. 

Following the creation of the 12 tablets, Roman law began to formulate itself into the ruling framework over the land. Many laws of the 12 tablets ultimately created a modernized society that effectively managed the behaviors of citizens through the institution of an affirmed legal code. 

Early Roman law consisted of numerous laws that ultimately formed a balanced society; for instance, laws were created to allow the marriage between plebeians and patricians—a fundamental law that effectively agglomerated society through the destruction of social barriers. Another important statute of early Roman law is regarded as the root for modern tort law; LexAquilla, the name of the statute, provided compensation to the owners of property that was injured by another citizens’ fault or negligent actions. 

Arguably the most important contribution that early Roman law possessed was not the enactment of statutes, but the emergence of a class of jurists and the creation of a legal science. 

Employee rights are the personal freedoms and privileges given to individuals who work in the United States, as well as other developed nations. Employee rights are affirmed through employment laws; in a general sense, employee rights are awarded to working individuals to protect their interests and safety in the workplace. 

The most basic and fundamental employee rights will offer the working individual the right to time off work, to contribute work without harassment, and the right to receive minimum as well as overtime pay. Those individuals who work and who do not receive such employee rights possess the ability to file lawsuits against their respective employers. If found guilty of violating these basic employee rights, the underlying employer will be forced to provide the respective employee with monetary compensation and punitive damages. 

Employee rights take the form of both state and federal laws; each individual state posts its own minimum wage scale that must abide by the federal scale enacted by the United States government. Employee rights regarding overtime, although up to the discretion of the particular employer, must also meet the federal guidelines instituted by the United States government.

All employees, except for those exempt such as salaried supervisors, are entitled to compensation for hours worked beyond the hours required in the individual’s particular employment contract. 

Another fundamental employee right is the right to earn a minimum wage. It is illegal, based on employee rights and coordinating employment laws, to pay individuals below the federal and local minimum wage level. No state may pay employers below the national minimum wage right, although the potential for workers in the service industry to collect tips, does enable an employer to pay a wage lower than the national level. 

Employee rights mandate that all employers allow their respective employees to take time off from work. The reasons for requesting time off can include the need for a vacation, family emergencies or medical leave. Regardless of the reason, an employer must satisfy this basic employee right; the amount of time off will vary based on company and the stipulations which elucidate on time off will be documented in the employment contract. 

All employees possess the right to enjoy a workplace that is free from harassment. Basic employee rights will protect workers against sexual harassment or harassment fueled by age, race or gender discrimination. If a worker is being harassed, the individual has the right to file claims with an administrative body to initiate the filing of a civil suit. 

A construction worker is an individual employed in the construction industry; a construction worker will perform various physical roles on construction sites. The term “construction worker” is somewhat broad and will incorporate general construction workers, such as members of specialist trades such as carpenters, plumbers and electricians. As a result of this incorporation, a construction worker will encompass a number of laborers who are engaged in physical work or the construction of a tangible building or site.

Within the field of construction includes specific roles that will incorporate a specialty aligned with the construction of a building. For example, when building a house, apartment or factory, numerous aspects of the creation must be accounted for. To properly build the structure, a construction company will utilize the following types of construction workers: 

A tradesman or a bricklayer is a fundamental type of construction worker; these individuals lay brick and construct brickwork. The term also incorporates those individuals who use blocks to construct walls and other forms of masonry. 

A construction worker can also be a carpenter, who is a skilled craftsman who performs a wide range of woodworking that includes constructing furniture, constructing buildings and other objects that are made of wood. This field of work will involve significant manual labor and outdoor work.

A carpet layer is another type of construction worker; these individuals specialize in laying flooring and carpets. 

A concrete finisher is a type of tradesmen who works with concrete. This role includes placing, fishing, repairing concrete in construction projects and protecting the structure.

A heavy equipment operator is a fundamental type of construction worker who drives and operates heavy equipment on the site. A heavy equipment operator will use various capital and heavy equipment to construct and engineer various projects.

A heating and cooling specialist is also required during the construction of a project. Healing and cooling specialists are types of tradesmen that specialize in water pumps and furnaces. 

An electrician is another type of construction worker; these tradesmen specialize in electrical wiring of buildings and other related equipment. An electrician may be employed in the construction of new buildings or the maintenance of existing infrastructure. 

Laborers are types of tradesmen who are proficient with hand tools, small heavy equipment, air tools and assisting other trades.

Plumbers are also incorporated with construction projects; a plumber is a type of tradesman who specializes in installing and maintaining systems used for heating, drainage, plumbing, potable water or small-sized industrial process plant piping. 

A pipefitter is someone who assembles, lays out, fabricates, maintains and repairs large-sized piping systems for industrial projects—these pipes are typically under high pressure and require various metals, such as stainless steel, carbon steel and other alloys. 

The last type of basic construction worker is a steel erector; these individuals are tradesman will install structural steel frames of building and engineering projects. This type of work is executed in small teams; each individual will use powered and hand tools to bolt the steelwork together. 

Contract Law is the legal field that undertakes the regulation, establishment, and oversight of legislation pertinent to contracts; contracts are defined as legally binding agreements whose expressed legality upon construction is required in order to substantiate the authenticity of the contract itself. A contract will typically include at least 2 entities who must agree to participate within the expressed stipulations and terms illustrated within the text of the contract. A legal contract will typically include 4 primary components:

An ‘Offer’ is the initial provision of the terms expressed within the contract

‘Acceptance’ is the agreement enacted by both parties with regard to participate in the contract

A ‘Counteroffer’ is an acknowledgement of the terms expressed within the contract – a counteroffer is not synonymous with the endorsement of a contact

The ‘Consideration’ is the identification of valued items that may be used as collateral in the event of a breached – or broken – contract

The precepts within Contract Law define an illegal contract as a contractual agreement deemed to be absent of the required satisfaction of legal statutes necessary for the contract to be viewed as legal. Within contract law, contracts may be deemed as illegal due for the following reasons:

The inclusion of a minor as a party to the endorsement or creation of a contract is considered to be illegal; as a result of their legal rights and liberties – in accordance with their respective age(s) – a minor is considered to be ineligible to endorse a contract

Contract Law states that the forced endorsement of a contract, which is defined as the participation in either the construction or signing of a contract under duress or threats imposed renders the contract to be illegal

Contract Law states that contracts or agreements including the implementation or involvement of products, services, or activities considered to be illegal within the jurisdiction in which the contract was constructed or endorsed is rendered as an illegal contract

Although the definitions of the two terms tend to become blurred both through misuse, as well as varying terminology, the precepts of contract law express that a contract and an agreement are not synonymous. While a contract may include a variety of agreements within its content, the primary difference between a contract and an agreement lies in the fact that the failure of one – or both parties – to adhere to the terms expressed within an agreement will typically be unable to result in legal action or punitive recourse. Conversely, the violation of the terms of a contract – upon that substantiation of that contract’s legality – may be subject to legal action or punitive recourse.

With regard to the legal review of contracts, Contract Law will oftentimes integrate the statutes expressed within tort law; a tort is derived from the French word meaning ‘wrong’ with regard to a wrong suffered by or upon an individual in conjunction to the involvement of another individual or entity:

Upon review of a broken – or breached – contract, the precepts of contract Law implements the legal procedure in which individual responsibility and action is classified and weighed without the mention or facilitation of a binding and legal contract

The analysis of any or all respective liability and participation is evaluated through litigation, case review, and witness testimony with regard to a broken or breached contract