Facebook
Home Contract Law

Contract Law

Deed Poll

Deed Poll

A deed poll is a type of legal document that only involves a single person or party, and which states a particular intention that such a person is bound to by the document itself. A deed poll itself is not a contract due to the fact that only one party is affected by such a legal document and it states only an intention, rather than a guarantee or promise. This kind of document is oftentimes referred to as a deed poll name change because it is very commonly used in order to enact a name change for an individual. 
Change name by deed poll is most commonly used in Europe, particularly in England, Ireland, and Northern Ireland. Other nations such as Hong Kong and New Zealand also use the deed poll name change.
Typically speaking, to change name by deed poll will require that a person complete a form, which must be signed by a witness. The form is then filed with the appropriate court. In many jurisdictions, deed poll name change may be considered as a legal name change, though change name by deed poll may not necessarily change a person’s name on the birth certificate. 
Therefore, in the case that a passport is to be obtained, for instance, both the birth certificate and the change name by deed poll document will need to be furnished in order to complete the passport requirements.

What You Need to Know About Contract Templates

What You Need to Know About Contract Templates

Contract templates are used by many companies so that the company only has to have a contract drafted and examined by a lawyer or legal professional a single time. If the contract template is examined and declared to be legally valid and capable of standing up to close inspection or in a court of law, the contract template may then be used to create future contracts in as effective and efficient manner as possible in terms of both the time and money that is required to create a contract between different and additional groups. 
However, since a contract template may make use of boilerplate language, there is a danger that if the contract templates do not make the contract template’s terms easily accessible and comprehensible, the contract template may not be considered valid and might result in a party that disputes a contract that develops from the contract template. 
Contract templates are available for almost any conceivable contractual situation. A contract template may be produced by specific corporate contract software programs, or a contract template may also be used to create contracts from other templates in other, commonly available software programs and products.

What You Didn’t Know About Contract Management

What You Didn't Know About Contract Management

What is Contract Management? 
Contract management, also referred to as contract administration, is the management of contracts that are created between customers, partners, vendors or employees. The field of contract management includes negotiating the terms and conditions present in these contractual agreements, while subsequently ensuring that these stipulations adhere to compliance issues designated by the underlying company or industry. 
In addition, contract management entails the documenting and agreeing on all changes that may come to light during the implementation and execution of such contractual agreements. 
Contract management can be best summarized as the formal process of efficiently managing the creation of a contract, along with expediting the execution and required analysis of the contract. The systematic approach of contract management is required to maximize the financial and operational capabilities and performance of the underlying parties. In addition, contract management is undertaken to mitigate the risk associated with a contractual agreement.
Contract management deals with contractual agreements that are made in a commercial setting; common forms of commercial contracts will include employment letters, purchase orders, sales invoices and utility contracts. The more complicated forms of commercial contracts will include contractual agreements regarding constructions projects, the exchange of goods or services that are regulated by a government authority or require the delivery of technical specifications, intellectual property agreements and issues revolving around international trade. 


Common Areas of Contract Management:
Contract management, in the most simplistic of forms, will expedite the drawing and execution of a business contract. A business-standard contract model, as carried-out by numerous organizations throughout the United States of America will typically review and systematically inspect the following areas of business disciplines:
Baseline management
Commitment management
Authoring and negotiating the business contract
Creating a visible contract that is easily understood by both parties
Growth Contracts for sales-side contractual obligations
A contract management team will expedite the creation and delivery of numerous types of contracts, including purchasing contracts, partnership agreements, trade agreements, intellectual property agreements and sales contracts. 
A purchasing contract is a legally-binding agreement between a company (the buying party) and a supplier who promises to sell products and/or services that meet the terms and conditions within the contract. The company, in return, is obligated to acknowledge the transfer of goods and services and to pay the seller for the offering.
A sales contract is a legally-binding agreement between a company (the seller) and a customer; in this contractual agreement, the company agrees to sell products or services to the customer. In return, the customer is obligated to pay for the products or services purchased.
A partnership agreement may take the form of a contract which formally establishes the terms of a partnership formation between two legal entities. A partnership agreement, in regards to contract management, may also merely reflect the desire of the parties to act is if both are forming a partnership with common goals.  

Important Facts About The Punishment For A Breach Of Contract

Important Facts About The Punishment For A Breach Of Contract

The punishment for breach of contract may vary based on the laws
in each jurisdiction, as well as the type of contract involved. For
example, a contract such as a lease which is breached can include financial
penalties and possible eviction of the tenant.

  

Leases that are involved in a breach of contract can include
penalties for both the landlord and the tenant. If the landlord breaches the
contract, the tenant may not be required to pay rent in certain circumstances
until the contract is being honored. For example, tenants may not have to pay
rent if there is no heat or air conditioning when the temperature reaches a
certain level because the landlord has breached the contract.

 

In contrast, tenants may be evicted if they are guilty of a breach
of contract and fail to pay the rent on time.


Important Facts About Breach of Contract

Important Facts About Breach of Contract

What is a Breach of Contract?
A breach of contract occurs when a party, who agreed to formulate a contractual obligation with another party, does not carry out the intended function of the contract. As a result, a breach of contract is a legal cause of action where the binding agreement latent in the contract, is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract. 
A breach of contract can result in an individual not carrying-out a specific performance that was expected by the contract or by interfering with the other party’s ability to perform the task. 
If a party, who agreed to formulate a contract with another party, does not fulfill his or her contractual promise or has given information to the other party that he or she will not perform his expected duty as labeled in the contract, the party is said to have performed a breach of contract. In addition, if the individual is unable to perform the obligations latent in the contract for whatever reason, a breach of contract is present. 

Types of Breaches:
Minor Breach of Contract: A minor breach of contract constitutes a party’s inability to perform the full task expected by the contract; a minor breach of contract is referred to as an immaterial or partial breach of contract. In these instances, the non-breaching party cannot sue for specific performance, and can only seek legal action for actual damages sustained. 
Material Breach of Contract: A material breach of contract is realized through any failure to perform, which ultimately permits the other party to the contract to collect damages because of the breach or compel performance. 
Fundamental Breach of Contract: A fundamental breach of contract is a breach that permits the aggrieved party to terminate performance of the formulated contract. In these scenarios, the non-breaching party is entitled to sue the breaching party for damages sustained. 
Anticipatory Breach of Contract: A breach of contract through anticipatory repudiation is an unequivocal indication that the party refuses to undertake the project or deliver performance as stipulated in the contract. Included in this type of breach, is a situation where a future non-performance is inevitable. This type of breach of contract allows the non-breaching party the option to treat the breach as immediate, which ultimately allows them to terminate the contract and sue for damages, without waiting for the actual breach to take place. 

Remedies of a Breach of Contract:

In most instances, the judicial remedy for a breach of contract is the delivery of monetary compensation for damages incurred. If the failure to perform or satisfy the contractual obligation cannot be redressed through monetary compensation, the underlying court may enter an equity decree, which will award an injunction or the delivery of a specific performance. 
The aggrieved person possesses the obligation to mitigate damages through reasonable means. In the United States, under contract law, punitive damages are typically not awarded for a breach of contract but may be awarded for other causes of action in a lawsuit. 

Oral Contract Vs Implied Contract?

Oral Contract Vs Implied Contract?

According to contract law, an oral contract is not considered an implied contract. An oral contract is an agreement that is agreed upon only by spoken communication. Although an oral contract originates from the mouth, it is common for a written contract to be created after the oral contract is stated.
In contract law, oral contracts are considered just as valid as written contracts. Some jurisdictions require that a contract be written up after an oral contract is made. Within this type of circumstance, the document must state that the original agreement was created verbally. 
An implied contract is an agreement that is not generally agreed upon. Instead, it is something that is more assumed to be followed. An example of this type of contract would be an employment contract where the employer does not specify hours but does specify the total amount of time required to be worked. 

Contract In Depth

Contract In Depth

A contract is a legal document which may be enforceable by legal action or by binding arbitration. In order for this to be true, however, the contract agreement must meet several important requirements. 
There must be a compensatory remedy for the contract under which the party which defaults is required to pay monetary compensation that would have otherwise been provided had the contract agreement been upheld, or an equitable remedy, which can also be called Specific Performance. The equitable remedy, or specific performance, compels an individual who enters into a contract agreement to carry out the action against which they have attempted to renege on their obligation. 
In order for a contract to be valid, the contract must involve unqualified, or “mirror”, acceptance. In order for a contract agreement to be valid, all parties must have the capacity to contract, and the terms of the contract cannot be trifling, indeterminate, or impossible. In the eyes of the law, a contract cannot be entered into to compel illegal action.
Although a contract is usually written in order to compel action, a contract agreement can also be created which will prevent a person from performing an act which they have the legal capacity to perform.
If a contract agreement is breached, legal remedies may be provided to address that breach.
Contract law, the legal field that specializes in the legal disposition of contracts and contract agreements, generally adheres to the Latin motto “pacta sunt servana,” meaning “pacts [agreements] must be kept.”

All You Need to Know On How to Revise a Policy

All You Need to Know On How to Revise a Policy

A policy, by definition, is a set of principles or rules that are implemented for the purpose of obtaining or reaching a particular outcome or goal. Therefore, policies, in essence, exist in a variety of endless contexts.
Though a policy may be implemented for a particular time achieving the intended purpose, it may prove necessary to amend or revise a policy. Revising a policy can take various routes.
Revising a policy will usually be at the discretion of the entities or parties that implement the policy in the first place. In devising a policy, it is common that procedures in the changing or revising of the policy be included for future reference or circumstance. Each individual policy that exists and the actual actions or procedures involved in revising a policy will differ in accordance to the needs of the faction or party and the changes that are to take place.

Definition of Designation

Definition of Designation

Designation is the term used to describe ownership one has over something. Designation is used commonly with wills and trusts. Designation of record is what the writer of the will or trust creates to submit to the court so that the court knows and understands who is in full control of the contract and the individual’s estates and assets after they have passed.
Designation of Record must be completed with the creator of the contract, the individual who will hold designation, and a lawyer. After the creator and the designator have settled on an agreement, the Designation of Record will then be signed off on and delivered to the court. Finally, the court will approve of the documents and the contract will be put into place. Generally, the contract will go into immediate effect at this point.

Government Files Lawsuit against Fluor Companies

Government Files Lawsuit against Fluor Companies


On November 8, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that the United States government is intervening in a case against Fluor Corporation and its subsidiary, Fluor Hanford Inc, after the Texas-based companies used federal funds for lobbying activity.  The lawsuit for violations of the False Claims Act was first filed by a whistleblower, Loydene Rambo.  


According to the Justice Department, Fluor had a contract with the Department of Energy (DOE) for multiple services at the Hanford Nuclear Site in Washington State between 1999 and 2008.  The facility is federally funded.  


According to the original complaint, part of the DOE contract stated that Fluor could not use the federal funds for lobbying.  The whistle blower’s complaint alleged that Fluor used the funds for lobbying from 2005 to 2008 anyway.  The company hired two lobbying firms, Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC, to lobby members of Congress and federal agencies.  


The United States has agreed to intervene in the case against Fluor, but the government will not intervene in cases against Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC.  Since Ms. Rambo filed the lawsuit under the False Claims Act, she can share a percentage of the recovery with the United States government.  


Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, stated: “The taxpayer money Congress allocated for this program was for training federal emergency response personnel and first responders, not to lobby Congress and other for more funding.  When public funds are misused, as alleged in this case, the Justice Department will work to restore them to the Treasury.”


The Civil Division of the Justice Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Washington are handling the case and receiving assistance from the Department of Energy Office of Inspector General.  


Source: U.S. Department of Justice
 

123...5Page 1 of 5
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X