Facebook
Home Contract Law

Contract Law

What are the Legal Actions To Take Against A Breached Trust

What are the Legal Actions To Take Against A Breached Trust

A breach of trust can occur in any number of circumstances, and in
each case there may be a differing form of legal recourse. When the breach of
trust is included with a breach of contract, there may be both legal and civil
penalties. 

 

For example, if there is a breach of contract between a day care
center and a parent, it may also include a breach of trust. If the day care
center took responsibility to care for a child and then failed to do so, they
may be charged with both breach of contract and breach of trust.

 

The result of those activities may influence whether or not the
charges are criminal or civil. If, for example, the child was injured because
of a failure to care for that child as promised, the charges would likely be
civil and criminal.

 

Promissory Estoppel Overview

Promissory Estoppel Overview

What is Promissory Estoppel?
In a general sense, Promissory Estoppel is a legal doctrine used in American law, which allows a party to recover on a promise, even if the promise was made without a formal consideration. In essence, a Promissory Estoppel prevents an individual from arguing that an underlying promise offered should not be upheld.
In addition, a Promissory Estoppel requires that a reliance on the promise was deemed reasonable and that the individual attempting to enforce the promise actually relied on the promise to his or her detriment. As is common with numerous forms of legality issues, the precise legal requirements needed to enact Promissory Estoppel may vary between jurisdictions within the United States.
A common example of Promissory Estoppel is where an employer offers an oral promise to pay an employee a monthly amount for the remainder of the individual’s retirement. If the employee relies on the promise and subsequently retires, the employer will likely be estopped, based on the principle of a promissory estoppel, from reneging on this promise to offer the monthly retirement payment.
Laws surrounding a Promissory Estoppel:
In a typical case of a promise or a contract, the law requires that a party receive consideration for the agreement. Consideration refers to a valuable asset that is exchanged between the two parties and the time of the agreement or the promise was made. Consideration can take the form of an asset, the exchange of monies, or the promise to refrain from doing something. Regardless of the form of consideration required in a contract, a consideration is needed in order to make an agreement or promise legally enforceable.
That being said, because the court system aims to achieve fairness, a legal forum will apply the doctrine of promissory estoppel in situations where a consideration is made. Even if an enforceable contract is not generated, the law may enforce the promise if a reasonable reliance and detriment are proven.
Differences between the Promissory Estoppel Doctrine and the Doctrine of Estoppel:
A promissory estoppel relies on a promise, while the doctrine of estoppel relies on a statement of fact. As a result of this foundational difference, the two doctrines complicate contractual agreements or the statement of a promise. Even if an agreement is not based on a formal consideration and even if promissory estoppel is not enforceable, because the situation did not include a promise, a court system can still enforce the “agreement” as a means to promote fairness.
This somewhat loose interpretation of promissory estoppel enables the court to impose obligations on the parties through the delivery of a quasi-contract—a doctrine that implied in law.

Definition of Designation

Definition of Designation

Designation is the term used to describe ownership one has over something. Designation is used commonly with wills and trusts. Designation of record is what the writer of the will or trust creates to submit to the court so that the court knows and understands who is in full control of the contract and the individual’s estates and assets after they have passed.
Designation of Record must be completed with the creator of the contract, the individual who will hold designation, and a lawyer. After the creator and the designator have settled on an agreement, the Designation of Record will then be signed off on and delivered to the court. Finally, the court will approve of the documents and the contract will be put into place. Generally, the contract will go into immediate effect at this point.

Contract Law Defined

Contract Law Defined

Contract law is defined as the body of law that governs oral and written contracts.  Included in contract law are topics on the nature of contracts, limitation of actions, breach of contract, termination of contract, and many more.  Put simply, contract law deals with the legal issues surrounding the formation, duration, breaching, or termination of contracts.  
For example, the Uniform Commercial Code is used in contract law to harmonize the law of sales and commercial interactions in the United States.  This Code is used in almost every state and is considered the standard in most states regarding laws on the sale of goods.  The Uniform Commercial Code is a long-standing act in contract law, a collaboration between the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute.


Breach of Contract
One of the most prevalent subjects in contract law is the idea of a breach of contract. A breach of contract is a legal concept characterized by one or more parties failing to honor the provisions stated in a contract.  For example, if an employee signs a non-compete agreement with an employer and begins his or her own company after being fired, he or she can be sued for breaching the contract.  Breaches of contract come in four main types:

Minor Breach
A minor breach of contract, also referred to as an immaterial breach, occurs when the non-breaching company is entitled only to compensatory damages.  

Material Breach
Unlike a minor breach, a material breach allows the non-breaching party to collect damages and a court-obligated performance of conditions stated in the contract.

Fundamental Breach
A fundamental breach, also referred to as an anticipatory repudiation, is a breach of contract so tangible that it may allow the non-breaching party to terminate the contract.  The party is then entitled to also sue for damages.


Anticipatory Breach
An anticipatory breach, also known as anticipatory repudiation, is when one party indicates that it will be unable to perform as the contract states, or that future non-performance is unavoidable.  In this case, the anticipatory breach may be treated as an actual breach and the non-breaching party can then sue for damages.
Avoiding a breach of contract is important for many different reasons.  For example, breaching a contract can lead to legal fees, a damaged business reputation, and damages.  These damages may include:

Compensatory damages
Compensatory damages are damages used to compensate for losses in order to bring the non-breaching party back to the position before the breach.


Nominal damages

Nominal damages are awarded when a breach occurs with no measureable financial loss.

Punitive damages
Punitive damages are made to the non-breaching party whose payment can extend beyond the financial losses of the breach.  They are meant to punish “wrongful acts” and are not specially aimed to remedy breaches of contract law.

Liquidated damages
Liquidated damages are identified by parties in the contract itself.
In addition to damages, a breach of contract may also bring specific performance or cancellation and restitution.  In specific performance, the court orders that the breaching party perform duties written into the contract.  In cancellation and restitution, the non-breaching party receives damages and is entitled to cancel the contract, voiding its terms.

Enforcing a Contract

To collect these remedies for breaches of contract, parties usually turn to small claims court.  However, going to small claims court can cost a significant amount of time and money in court appearances and court fees.  Many times, the parties will choose to go in another direction.  In these cases, a dispute may be brought to mediation or arbitration. 

Lawsuit
In most cases, the non-breaching party will sue for damages in small claims court.  A lawsuit can result in a number of remedies for the breached contract, including damages, specific performance, and cancellation and restitution.  A lawsuit can provide damages that will provide the non-breaching company with remedy for the breached contract, especially if it is measurable by the court.

Mediation
Mediation involves both parties working with a mediator to find ways to resolve the contract dispute.  A mediator is responsible for finding a solution that works for both parties.  Mediation allows the parties to minimize risk and control costs.  

Arbitration
Arbitration is similar to mediation in that there is a third party reviewing the dispute.  However, since arbitration is mandatory and legally binding (most of the time), many people will choose to undergo mediation instead of arbitration.

All You Need to Know On How to Revise a Policy

All You Need to Know On How to Revise a Policy

A policy, by definition, is a set of principles or rules that are implemented for the purpose of obtaining or reaching a particular outcome or goal. Therefore, policies, in essence, exist in a variety of endless contexts.
Though a policy may be implemented for a particular time achieving the intended purpose, it may prove necessary to amend or revise a policy. Revising a policy can take various routes.
Revising a policy will usually be at the discretion of the entities or parties that implement the policy in the first place. In devising a policy, it is common that procedures in the changing or revising of the policy be included for future reference or circumstance. Each individual policy that exists and the actual actions or procedures involved in revising a policy will differ in accordance to the needs of the faction or party and the changes that are to take place.

Quick and Easy Contract Law Cases

Quick and Easy Contract Law Cases

 

 
Contract law cases can be classified under the general law of obligations. The general category of the Law of Obligations includes Torts Law, Unjust Enrichment Law, and Restitution Law, besides Contracts Law.
 
 
One of the most famous contract law cases is the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. Although this case of contracts law is included in English contract law cases, the relevant principles of contracts law in the English system were adapted to the American courts.
 
 
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is one of the most famous contract law cases since it involved a manufacturer who offered a flu remedy called a “carbolic smoke ball.” The makers of the smoke ball, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, advertised in a newspaper that buyers who developed the flu despite using the smoke ball properly would be given 100 Pounds as a refund. 
 
 
The Company claimed that the advertisement was not a serious offer, but the judges in the case ruled that because there was a statement from the company that they had deposited money in an account so that they would be able to make the payments if there were any claims, a reasonable person had cause to believe that there was a sincere offer, thus meeting the requirement that there be an offer and acceptance to form a contract.

 

Privity of Contract Explained

Privity of Contract Explained

Privity of contract is a legal
doctrine that holds that a business contract, along with any other type of
contract, may not confer rights or impose obligations to any person or agent
except for the specific parties that have formed the contract.

Privity of contract is most
commonly an issue which arises during business contracts that have been formed
to allow for the sale of goods or services. Horizontal privity of contract
becomes an issue when the benefits bestowed by a contract are given to a third
party or a party that was not a part of the original contract. Vertical privity
of contract involves an independent contract that develops between one signer
of the original contract and another individual or other legal entity.

There are certain circumstances
under which privity of contract may be set aside which will allow the legal
entity who is not directly a part of the business contract to be allowed to sue
to force a party to the original contract to uphold their obligations. Privity
of contract will only allow a third party to the contract to go against one of
the original parties to the contract beyond the ability to collect the third
party’s entitlement to a benefit under the contract.

Quick Blurb on Contract Laws

Quick Blurb on Contract Laws

Contract law is the legal
specialty that addresses the creation and execution of contracts. The rules and
regulations established in contract law indicate that a contract is a legally
binding document. Therefore, once a contract is signed by all participating
parties, these individuals are legally obligated to adhere to the conditions
outlined in the contract.

Following the authorization of
the contract, a participating party cannot choose to alter the contract. The
terms and conditions of the contract can only be altered or modified if all
parties agree to the changes. In the event that this occurs, a new contract
will need to be created. 

The new contract will detail any modifications made to
the original contract. However, if one participating party opposed the alteration
of the original contract, then the contract cannot be modified. The party who
wanted to alter the contract conditions will be required to adhere to the terms
of the original contract.

 

What are Sample Contracts

What are Sample Contracts

Using sample contracts can help individuals to create contracts that will adhere to the basic tenets of contract law while still being able to adapt to the contract in question to adhere to and suit the particular needs of the contractual situation in which they find themselves. Contract forms may be created that will provide blank spots in the sample contract into which a party will be able to affix their name or any other relevant information needed to transform the sample contract form into a legally recognized valid contract.
Contract forms can exist for the sale of goods, to form employment contracts, to create a relationship between a landlord and tenant, to form a legally valid will or trust, to form consent or release documents, and to create contracts for marriage or cohabitation.
Other examples of sample contracts include: event contracts; household services contracts; durable power of attorney contracts; medical directives; other health and medical contract forms; a variety of job contract forms, such as independent contractor agreements, consultation contract forms, project management contract, or a sample contract for bidding on a job; professional services contracts, such as a sample contract for child care, sample contracts for models, contract forms for a lien, a housing board contract, a sample contract for maintenance, or model, painting, or photography sample contracts; contract forms for real estate sales, rental contracts, general sales contracts, or miscellaneous other forms of contract.
 

Important Facts to Know When Refusing To Sign A Contract

Important Facts to Know When Refusing To Sign A Contract

Contact law encompasses a variety of types of contacts. In many cases, the rules and laws apply to all contracts. However, there are some specific laws which only apply to certain contracts.
For example, if an individual refuses to sign an updated contract, the repercussions would depend on the type of contract. In some cases, there is no recourse if individuals refuse to sign an updated contract, and the other party could in fact be charged with breach of contract if they refuse to honor the old contract.
For example, employers that distribute a new contract may request that all employees sign it. If an employee refuses to do so, they are still under the old contract. If that employee were terminated based on the new contract, the employer could be charged with breach of contract for the original contract.
 
123...5Page 1 of 5
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X