Facebook
Home Contract Law

Contract Law

Read This Before Entering Into A Quasi Contract

Read This Before Entering Into A Quasi Contract

What is a Quasi Contract?
A quasi-contract is a fictional contract that was created by courts to promote equitable treatment. As a result of this definition, a quasi-contract is not an actual, legally-binding document, but instead a legal substitute for a contract that is formed to impose equity between two distinct parties. 
The basic concept of a quasi-contract is that a contractual agreement should have been formed in situations where such an agreement was not realized. The quasi-contract is thus used when a court system feels as though it is appropriate to create an obligation to avoid an injustice and to promote equality between two parties. 
In most cases, the actual existence of a real contract is required for a defendant to be held liable for services rendered; however, in many jurisdictions throughout the United States, under certain circumstances, a plaintiff may be entitled to seek restitution under a quasi-contract.
Basic Elements of a Quasi Contract:
The basic elements of a quasi-contract require three fundamental principles. The first element is that the plaintiff furnished valuable goods or required specific services to be rendered with a reasonable expectation of being compensated if the defendant breached or failed to meet these expectations. Secondly, the defendant must knowingly have accepted the aforementioned goods and obtained a direct benefit through this acceptance. 
And lastly, the defendant must receive benefits by the goods or services that are regarded as unfair in situations where the plaintiff received no compensation.
In a standard, legally-binding contract, both parties agree to the stipulations of the deal and the surrounding subject matter, to affirm the agreement and to make the contract binding, the parties enter into an oral or written agreement prior to exchange of goods or services. 
In a quasi-contract; however, one of the parties does not intend to enter the contract. Even though mutual assent is not achieved, the court can decide to create a contract to promote fairness between the two parties. 
In most instances, a quasi-contract is created when disputes over payments of goods or services arise between two parties. When these situations arise, the remedy for a quasi-contract is typically limited to whatever is necessary to prevent the presence of unjust enrichment obtained by one of the parties. 
This typically means, in regards to the creation of a quasi-contract, that damages are restricted to the cost of the plaintiff’s materials and labor. In these situations, profits are excluded on the grounds that it is unfair for a party who did not want to enter a contract to pay the profits to the other party. 

Understand Your Rights As An Employee

Understand Your Rights As An Employee

What are Employee Rights?
Employee rights are the personal freedoms and privileges given to individuals who work in the United States, as well as other developed nations. Employee rights are affirmed through employment laws; in a general sense, employee rights are awarded to working individuals to protect their interests and safety in the workplace. 
The most basic and fundamental employee rights will offer the working individual the right to time off work, to contribute work without harassment, and the right to receive minimum as well as overtime pay. Those individuals who work and who do not receive such employee rights possess the ability to file lawsuits against their respective employers. If found guilty of violating these basic employee rights, the underlying employer will be forced to provide the respective employee with monetary compensation and punitive damages. 
Employee rights take the form of both state and federal laws; each individual state posts its own minimum wage scale that must abide by the federal scale enacted by the United States government. Employee rights regarding overtime, although up to the discretion of the particular employer, must also meet the federal guidelines instituted by the United States government.
All employees, except for those exempt such as salaried supervisors, are entitled to compensation for hours worked beyond the hours required in the individual’s particular employment contract. 

Minimum Wage:
Another fundamental employee right is the right to earn a minimum wage. It is illegal, based on employee rights and coordinating employment laws, to pay individuals below the federal and local minimum wage level. No state may pay employers below the national minimum wage right, although the potential for workers in the service industry to collect tips, does enable an employer to pay a wage lower than the national level. 


Time off Work:
Employee rights mandate that all employers allow their respective employees to take time off from work. The reasons for requesting time off can include the need for a vacation, family emergencies or medical leave. Regardless of the reason, an employer must satisfy this basic employee right; the amount of time off will vary based on company and the stipulations which elucidate on time off will be documented in the employment contract. 

Workplace Rights:
All employees possess the right to enjoy a workplace that is free from harassment. Basic employee rights will protect workers against sexual harassment or harassment fueled by age, race or gender discrimination. If a worker is being harassed, the individual has the right to file claims with an administrative body to initiate the filing of a civil suit. 

Using A Contract Termination Letter

Using A Contract Termination Letter

A contract termination letter template may be used by a company in order to ensure that they terminate any contract in which they are currently in a method that will completely avoid further complications which can cause further disputes.
A contract termination letter template can be created to create an employment contract termination letter, a business contract termination letter, or a construction contract termination letter. These three contract termination letter types are the most common, which means that one of these three contract termination letter templates is most likely to be encountered or needed.
The essential elements to include in a contract termination letter are the names and specifications that can be used to identify the party to the contract who is receiving the contract termination letter. The contract termination letter should contain an opportunity to refer to the terms and conditions that were present in the original contract that empowers the party to terminate the contract.
If the contract termination letter involves a contract that requires the party breaking to contract to provide monetary compensation for breaking the contract, it is essential that the contract termination letter mentions how the payment will be provided.
A contract termination letter must include the code under which the individual gains the authorization to terminate the contract. This restriction primarily applies to a contract termination letter provided by a company to an employee. 
A contract termination letter should be completely professional.

What You Must Know About Withholding Employee Wages

What You Must Know About Withholding Employee Wages

Employers are
legally allowed to withhold employee wages when state, local, or Federal law
requires them to do so. The Federal law of the United States actually requires
employers to withhold wages to satisfy payroll tax requirements administered
through the Internal Revenue Service.

The payroll
tax requirements are used to fund Federal income tax, Medicare tax, and Social
Security tax. If an employer did not withhold employee wages, there would be no
way to fund such programs or levies. In addition, if local law requires it, the
employer is also required to withhold wages for state taxation. 

As a result of the tax responsibilities, all
employers withhold a certain percentage of an employee’s wages. That being
said, employers are not allowed to withhold wages for any circumstance that is
not aligned with taxation or funding company programs or benefits. Withholding
wages without reason is illegal under United States employment law.

Important Facts About Breach of Contract

Important Facts About Breach of Contract

What is a Breach of Contract?
A breach of contract occurs when a party, who agreed to formulate a contractual obligation with another party, does not carry out the intended function of the contract. As a result, a breach of contract is a legal cause of action where the binding agreement latent in the contract, is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract. 
A breach of contract can result in an individual not carrying-out a specific performance that was expected by the contract or by interfering with the other party’s ability to perform the task. 
If a party, who agreed to formulate a contract with another party, does not fulfill his or her contractual promise or has given information to the other party that he or she will not perform his expected duty as labeled in the contract, the party is said to have performed a breach of contract. In addition, if the individual is unable to perform the obligations latent in the contract for whatever reason, a breach of contract is present. 

Types of Breaches:
Minor Breach of Contract: A minor breach of contract constitutes a party’s inability to perform the full task expected by the contract; a minor breach of contract is referred to as an immaterial or partial breach of contract. In these instances, the non-breaching party cannot sue for specific performance, and can only seek legal action for actual damages sustained. 
Material Breach of Contract: A material breach of contract is realized through any failure to perform, which ultimately permits the other party to the contract to collect damages because of the breach or compel performance. 
Fundamental Breach of Contract: A fundamental breach of contract is a breach that permits the aggrieved party to terminate performance of the formulated contract. In these scenarios, the non-breaching party is entitled to sue the breaching party for damages sustained. 
Anticipatory Breach of Contract: A breach of contract through anticipatory repudiation is an unequivocal indication that the party refuses to undertake the project or deliver performance as stipulated in the contract. Included in this type of breach, is a situation where a future non-performance is inevitable. This type of breach of contract allows the non-breaching party the option to treat the breach as immediate, which ultimately allows them to terminate the contract and sue for damages, without waiting for the actual breach to take place. 

Remedies of a Breach of Contract:

In most instances, the judicial remedy for a breach of contract is the delivery of monetary compensation for damages incurred. If the failure to perform or satisfy the contractual obligation cannot be redressed through monetary compensation, the underlying court may enter an equity decree, which will award an injunction or the delivery of a specific performance. 
The aggrieved person possesses the obligation to mitigate damages through reasonable means. In the United States, under contract law, punitive damages are typically not awarded for a breach of contract but may be awarded for other causes of action in a lawsuit. 

Make Sure You Know the Basic Principles of Law of Contract

Make Sure You Know the Basic Principles of Law of Contract

What is the Law of Contract?
As is common with the majority of legal principles, the basic fundamentals of contract law will vary by jurisdictions throughout the United States. In all jurisdictions; however, a contract must require an offer, a subsequent acceptance or agreement to the stipulations within the contract, and consideration.
These characteristics are in essence, the foundation for a document to be regarded as a legally binding and valid contract.
 
Basic Principles of the Law of Contract:
The law of contract states that the first step required to form a valid contract is that an offer must be formally made by one of the parties to another. A common example to elucidate upon this principle is found in the sale of property; the purchaser, in this example, must make an offer to purchase the underlying property. This offer may include simplistic or complex terms, but it must be concrete and affirmed through written documentation.
Following the offer, the contract, as stated by the law of contract, must be accepted by the offered party. Using the sale of property as an example, the seller must affirmatively accept the offer; the original offer may be accepted in a written or spoken form.
If the offered party proposes a counteroffer, an acceptance is not realized. When a court determines whether or not an offer and acceptance was realized, the judicial body using the law of contract will look for a formal meeting or a concurrence of wills to decide if the requirements latent in the offer and acceptance statutes of the law of contract had been satisfied.
Lastly, the basic principles of the law of contract will require consideration to be given for the contract to maintain a legal or valid status. Consideration simply means that something of value was exchanged between the agreeing parties. In most instances, the consideration takes the form of money or an asset that holds considerable value.
In some scenarios; however, consideration can take the form of refraining from performing a function or doing something that the party is otherwise entitled to initiate. Regardless of the form, the consideration given must be sufficient, but does not need to be adequate to validate the stipulations latent in the contract.
 
Court Evaluations of a Contractual Agreement:
 
In addition to the basic principles of the law of contract, a court system, when evaluating the validity of a contractual agreement will evaluate the capacity of the party’s when the agreement was reached. The capacity to enter into a contract may be affected by numerous factors; for instance, minors do not possess the legal capacity to enter into a contract. In addition, a person’s mental state may also be considered when evaluating whether the person had the capacity or ability to enter into a valid contract.
Numerous courts will look to the legality of a contract when determining its validity. If a contract requires an individual to do something illegal, it will be deemed void on its face.

Easy Guide to Contract Law

Easy Guide to Contract Law

What is a Contract Law?
 
Contract Law is the legal field that undertakes the regulation, establishment, and oversight of legislation pertinent to contracts; contracts are defined as legally binding agreements whose expressed legality upon construction is required in order to substantiate the authenticity of the contract itself. A contract will typically include at least 2 entities who must agree to participate within the expressed stipulations and terms illustrated within the text of the contract. A legal contract will typically include 4 primary components:
An ‘Offer’ is the initial provision of the terms expressed within the contract
‘Acceptance’ is the agreement enacted by both parties with regard to participate in the contract
A ‘Counteroffer’ is an acknowledgement of the terms expressed within the contract – a counteroffer is not synonymous with the endorsement of a contact
The ‘Consideration’ is the identification of valued items that may be used as collateral in the event of a breached – or broken – contract
What is an Illegal Contract?
 
The precepts within Contract Law define an illegal contract as a contractual agreement deemed to be absent of the required satisfaction of legal statutes necessary for the contract to be viewed as legal. Within contract law, contracts may be deemed as illegal due for the following reasons:
The inclusion of a minor as a party to the endorsement or creation of a contract is considered to be illegal; as a result of their legal rights and liberties – in accordance with their respective age(s) – a minor is considered to be ineligible to endorse a contract
Contract Law states that the forced endorsement of a contract, which is defined as the participation in either the construction or signing of a contract under duress or threats imposed renders the contract to be illegal
Contract Law states that contracts or agreements including the implementation or involvement of products, services, or activities considered to be illegal within the jurisdiction in which the contract was constructed or endorsed is rendered as an illegal contract
Contract vs. Agreement
 
Although the definitions of the two terms tend to become blurred both through misuse, as well as varying terminology, the precepts of contract law express that a contract and an agreement are not synonymous. While a contract may include a variety of agreements within its content, the primary difference between a contract and an agreement lies in the fact that the failure of one – or both parties – to adhere to the terms expressed within an agreement will typically be unable to result in legal action or punitive recourse. Conversely, the violation of the terms of a contract – upon that substantiation of that contract’s legality – may be subject to legal action or punitive recourse.
Contract Law Trials and Hearings
With regard to the legal review of contracts, Contract Law will oftentimes integrate the statutes expressed within tort law; a tort is derived from the French word meaning ‘wrong’ with regard to a wrong suffered by or upon an individual in conjunction to the involvement of another individual or entity:
Upon review of a broken – or breached – contract, the precepts of contract Law implements the legal procedure in which individual responsibility and action is classified and weighed without the mention or facilitation of a binding and legal contract
The analysis of any or all respective liability and participation is evaluated through litigation, case review, and witness testimony with regard to a broken or breached contract

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

  
Promissory estoppel is one of the broad categories of reliance-based estoppels. Promissory estoppel is differentiated from the other two forms of reliance-based estoppel, estoppel by representation of fact and proprietary estoppel, in that promissory estoppel applies where one person makes a promise to another person, but there is no contract that can be enforced to make the person carry out the promised action.


In order for promissory estoppel to apply, the party that has been victimized must prove in court that there was both an inducement and a detrimental reliance. In other words, there has to be evidence that one party intended for the victim to act on the promise or representation, or the victim must satisfy the court that their actions were a reasonable response to the relevant promise or representation. 


The victim must also show that the actions that the victim engaged in were either reasonable or were the intended response to the representation made, and that the victim would suffer a loss or detriment at the current moment  in the event the other party were permitted to be released from the assumed obligation. For the courts to find that promissory estoppel applies it must be shown that it would be unconscionable to allow the party to benefit from their actions.


Promissory estoppel and estoppel by representation of fact are mutually exclusive concepts. Estoppel by representation of fact is based on a representation of some mixture of law and fact, while promissory estoppel is based on a promise to fail to exercise a previously existing right.

Contract In Depth

Contract In Depth

A contract is a legal document which may be enforceable by legal action or by binding arbitration. In order for this to be true, however, the contract agreement must meet several important requirements. 
There must be a compensatory remedy for the contract under which the party which defaults is required to pay monetary compensation that would have otherwise been provided had the contract agreement been upheld, or an equitable remedy, which can also be called Specific Performance. The equitable remedy, or specific performance, compels an individual who enters into a contract agreement to carry out the action against which they have attempted to renege on their obligation. 
In order for a contract to be valid, the contract must involve unqualified, or “mirror”, acceptance. In order for a contract agreement to be valid, all parties must have the capacity to contract, and the terms of the contract cannot be trifling, indeterminate, or impossible. In the eyes of the law, a contract cannot be entered into to compel illegal action.
Although a contract is usually written in order to compel action, a contract agreement can also be created which will prevent a person from performing an act which they have the legal capacity to perform.
If a contract agreement is breached, legal remedies may be provided to address that breach.
Contract law, the legal field that specializes in the legal disposition of contracts and contract agreements, generally adheres to the Latin motto “pacta sunt servana,” meaning “pacts [agreements] must be kept.”

What Does Without Recourse Mean

What Does Without Recourse Mean

Without recourse is a legal
phrase used by an endorser of a negotiable instrument to signify that if the
payment of the instrument is denied or refused, the endorser will not be held
responsible. An
endorser is an individual who signs a document that didn’t originally make it.

The negotiable instruments involved with this
definition typically refer to business or personal checks or promissory notes.
An individual who endorses such an instrument will attach the phrase
“without recourse” to specifically decline the responsibility of
payment. Through the incorporation of this phrase, the endorser declines
responsibility by virtue of the endorsement and becomes merely the assignor of
the title to the negotiable instrument.

The without recourse clause is governed by the
broader laws associated with the distribution of Commercial paper, which is
codified through the Uniform Commercial Code of the United States Federal
Government. As a result, a without recourse attachment will be honored by all
courts assuming basic requirements are met.

123...5Page 1 of 5
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X