A breach of trust can occur in any number of circumstances, and in
each case there may be a differing form of legal recourse. When the breach of
trust is included with a breach of contract, there may be both legal and civil
penalties. 

 

For example, if there is a breach of contract between a day care
center and a parent, it may also include a breach of trust. If the day care
center took responsibility to care for a child and then failed to do so, they
may be charged with both breach of contract and breach of trust.

 

The result of those activities may influence whether or not the
charges are criminal or civil. If, for example, the child was injured because
of a failure to care for that child as promised, the charges would likely be
civil and criminal.

 

The punishment for breach of contract may vary based on the laws
in each jurisdiction, as well as the type of contract involved. For
example, a contract such as a lease which is breached can include financial
penalties and possible eviction of the tenant.

  

Leases that are involved in a breach of contract can include
penalties for both the landlord and the tenant. If the landlord breaches the
contract, the tenant may not be required to pay rent in certain circumstances
until the contract is being honored. For example, tenants may not have to pay
rent if there is no heat or air conditioning when the temperature reaches a
certain level because the landlord has breached the contract.

 

In contrast, tenants may be evicted if they are guilty of a breach
of contract and fail to pay the rent on time.

Contact law encompasses a variety of types of contacts. In many cases, the rules and laws apply to all contracts. However, there are some specific laws which only apply to certain contracts.

For example, if an individual refuses to sign an updated contract, the repercussions would depend on the type of contract. In some cases, there is no recourse if individuals refuse to sign an updated contract, and the other party could in fact be charged with breach of contract if they refuse to honor the old contract.

For example, employers that distribute a new contract may request that all employees sign it. If an employee refuses to do so, they are still under the old contract. If that employee were terminated based on the new contract, the employer could be charged with breach of contract for the original contract.

 

Contract law is defined as the body of law that governs oral and written contracts.  Included in contract law are topics on the nature of contracts, limitation of actions, breach of contract, termination of contract, and many more.  Put simply, contract law deals with the legal issues surrounding the formation, duration, breaching, or termination of contracts.  

For example, the Uniform Commercial Code is used in contract law to harmonize the law of sales and commercial interactions in the United States.  This Code is used in almost every state and is considered the standard in most states regarding laws on the sale of goods.  The Uniform Commercial Code is a long-standing act in contract law, a collaboration between the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute.

One of the most prevalent subjects in contract law is the idea of a breach of contract. A breach of contract is a legal concept characterized by one or more parties failing to honor the provisions stated in a contract.  For example, if an employee signs a non-compete agreement with an employer and begins his or her own company after being fired, he or she can be sued for breaching the contract.  Breaches of contract come in four main types:

A minor breach of contract, also referred to as an immaterial breach, occurs when the non-breaching company is entitled only to compensatory damages.  

Unlike a minor breach, a material breach allows the non-breaching party to collect damages and a court-obligated performance of conditions stated in the contract.

A fundamental breach, also referred to as an anticipatory repudiation, is a breach of contract so tangible that it may allow the non-breaching party to terminate the contract.  The party is then entitled to also sue for damages.

An anticipatory breach, also known as anticipatory repudiation, is when one party indicates that it will be unable to perform as the contract states, or that future non-performance is unavoidable.  In this case, the anticipatory breach may be treated as an actual breach and the non-breaching party can then sue for damages.

Avoiding a breach of contract is important for many different reasons.  For example, breaching a contract can lead to legal fees, a damaged business reputation, and damages.  These damages may include:

Compensatory damages are damages used to compensate for losses in order to bring the non-breaching party back to the position before the breach.

Nominal damages are awarded when a breach occurs with no measureable financial loss.

Punitive damages are made to the non-breaching party whose payment can extend beyond the financial losses of the breach.  They are meant to punish “wrongful acts” and are not specially aimed to remedy breaches of contract law.

Liquidated damages are identified by parties in the contract itself.

In addition to damages, a breach of contract may also bring specific performance or cancellation and restitution.  In specific performance, the court orders that the breaching party perform duties written into the contract.  In cancellation and restitution, the non-breaching party receives damages and is entitled to cancel the contract, voiding its terms.

To collect these remedies for breaches of contract, parties usually turn to small claims court.  However, going to small claims court can cost a significant amount of time and money in court appearances and court fees.  Many times, the parties will choose to go in another direction.  In these cases, a dispute may be brought to mediation or arbitration. 

In most cases, the non-breaching party will sue for damages in small claims court.  A lawsuit can result in a number of remedies for the breached contract, including damages, specific performance, and cancellation and restitution.  A lawsuit can provide damages that will provide the non-breaching company with remedy for the breached contract, especially if it is measurable by the court.

Mediation involves both parties working with a mediator to find ways to resolve the contract dispute.  A mediator is responsible for finding a solution that works for both parties.  Mediation allows the parties to minimize risk and control costs.  

Arbitration is similar to mediation in that there is a third party reviewing the dispute.  However, since arbitration is mandatory and legally binding (most of the time), many people will choose to undergo mediation instead of arbitration.

Contract Law is the legal field that undertakes the regulation, establishment, and oversight of legislation pertinent to contracts; contracts are defined as legally binding agreements whose expressed legality upon construction is required in order to substantiate the authenticity of the contract itself. A contract will typically include at least 2 entities who must agree to participate within the expressed stipulations and terms illustrated within the text of the contract. A legal contract will typically include 4 primary components:

An ‘Offer’ is the initial provision of the terms expressed within the contract

‘Acceptance’ is the agreement enacted by both parties with regard to participate in the contract

A ‘Counteroffer’ is an acknowledgement of the terms expressed within the contract – a counteroffer is not synonymous with the endorsement of a contact

The ‘Consideration’ is the identification of valued items that may be used as collateral in the event of a breached – or broken – contract

The precepts within Contract Law define an illegal contract as a contractual agreement deemed to be absent of the required satisfaction of legal statutes necessary for the contract to be viewed as legal. Within contract law, contracts may be deemed as illegal due for the following reasons:

The inclusion of a minor as a party to the endorsement or creation of a contract is considered to be illegal; as a result of their legal rights and liberties – in accordance with their respective age(s) – a minor is considered to be ineligible to endorse a contract

Contract Law states that the forced endorsement of a contract, which is defined as the participation in either the construction or signing of a contract under duress or threats imposed renders the contract to be illegal

Contract Law states that contracts or agreements including the implementation or involvement of products, services, or activities considered to be illegal within the jurisdiction in which the contract was constructed or endorsed is rendered as an illegal contract

Although the definitions of the two terms tend to become blurred both through misuse, as well as varying terminology, the precepts of contract law express that a contract and an agreement are not synonymous. While a contract may include a variety of agreements within its content, the primary difference between a contract and an agreement lies in the fact that the failure of one – or both parties – to adhere to the terms expressed within an agreement will typically be unable to result in legal action or punitive recourse. Conversely, the violation of the terms of a contract – upon that substantiation of that contract’s legality – may be subject to legal action or punitive recourse.

With regard to the legal review of contracts, Contract Law will oftentimes integrate the statutes expressed within tort law; a tort is derived from the French word meaning ‘wrong’ with regard to a wrong suffered by or upon an individual in conjunction to the involvement of another individual or entity:

Upon review of a broken – or breached – contract, the precepts of contract Law implements the legal procedure in which individual responsibility and action is classified and weighed without the mention or facilitation of a binding and legal contract

The analysis of any or all respective liability and participation is evaluated through litigation, case review, and witness testimony with regard to a broken or breached contract