Read This Before Entering Into A Quasi Contract

What is a Quasi Contract?

A quasi-contract is a fictional contract that was created by courts to promote equitable treatment. As a result of this definition, a quasi-contract is not an actual, legally-binding document, but instead a legal substitute for a contract that is formed to impose equity between two distinct parties.

The basic concept of a quasi-contract is that a contractual agreement should have been formed in situations where such an agreement was not realized. The quasi-contract is thus used when a court system feels as though it is appropriate to create an obligation to avoid an injustice and to promote equality between two parties.

In most cases, the actual existence of a real contract is required for a defendant to be held liable for services rendered; however, in many jurisdictions throughout the United States, under certain circumstances, a plaintiff may be entitled to seek restitution under a quasi-contract.

Basic Elements of a Quasi Contract:

The basic elements of a quasi-contract require three fundamental principles. The first element is that the plaintiff furnished valuable goods or required specific services to be rendered with a reasonable expectation of being compensated if the defendant breached or failed to meet these expectations. Secondly, the defendant must knowingly have accepted the aforementioned goods and obtained a direct benefit through this acceptance.

And lastly, the defendant must receive benefits by the goods or services that are regarded as unfair in situations where the plaintiff received no compensation.

In a standard, legally-binding contract, both parties agree to the stipulations of the deal and the surrounding subject matter, to affirm the agreement and to make the contract binding, the parties enter into an oral or written agreement prior to exchange of goods or services.

In a quasi-contract; however, one of the parties does not intend to enter the contract. Even though mutual assent is not achieved, the court can decide to create a contract to promote fairness between the two parties.

In most instances, a quasi-contract is created when disputes over payments of goods or services arise between two parties. When these situations arise, the remedy for a quasi-contract is typically limited to whatever is necessary to prevent the presence of unjust enrichment obtained by one of the parties.

This typically means, in regards to the creation of a quasi-contract, that damages are restricted to the cost of the plaintiff’s materials and labor. In these situations, profits are excluded on the grounds that it is unfair for a party who did not want to enter a contract to pay the profits to the other party.

Easy Guide to Contract Law

What is a Contract Law?

Contract Law is the legal field that undertakes the regulation, establishment, and oversight of legislation pertinent to contracts; contracts are defined as legally binding agreements whose expressed legality upon construction is required in order to substantiate the authenticity of the contract itself. A contract will typically include at least 2 entities who must agree to participate within the expressed stipulations and terms illustrated within the text of the contract. A legal contract will typically include 4 primary components:

An ‘Offer’ is the initial provision of the terms expressed within the contract

‘Acceptance’ is the agreement enacted by both parties with regard to participate in the contract

A ‘Counteroffer’ is an acknowledgement of the terms expressed within the contract – a counteroffer is not synonymous with the endorsement of a contact

The ‘Consideration’ is the identification of valued items that may be used as collateral in the event of a breached – or broken – contract

What is an Illegal Contract?

The precepts within Contract Law define an illegal contract as a contractual agreement deemed to be absent of the required satisfaction of legal statutes necessary for the contract to be viewed as legal. Within contract law, contracts may be deemed as illegal due for the following reasons:

The inclusion of a minor as a party to the endorsement or creation of a contract is considered to be illegal; as a result of their legal rights and liberties – in accordance with their respective age(s) – a minor is considered to be ineligible to endorse a contract

Contract Law states that the forced endorsement of a contract, which is defined as the participation in either the construction or signing of a contract under duress or threats imposed renders the contract to be illegal

Contract Law states that contracts or agreements including the implementation or involvement of products, services, or activities considered to be illegal within the jurisdiction in which the contract was constructed or endorsed is rendered as an illegal contract

Contract vs. Agreement

Although the definitions of the two terms tend to become blurred both through misuse, as well as varying terminology, the precepts of contract law express that a contract and an agreement are not synonymous. While a contract may include a variety of agreements within its content, the primary difference between a contract and an agreement lies in the fact that the failure of one – or both parties – to adhere to the terms expressed within an agreement will typically be unable to result in legal action or punitive recourse. Conversely, the violation of the terms of a contract – upon that substantiation of that contract’s legality – may be subject to legal action or punitive recourse.

Contract Law Trials and Hearings

With regard to the legal review of contracts, Contract Law will oftentimes integrate the statutes expressed within tort law; a tort is derived from the French word meaning ‘wrong’ with regard to a wrong suffered by or upon an individual in conjunction to the involvement of another individual or entity:

Upon review of a broken – or breached – contract, the precepts of contract Law implements the legal procedure in which individual responsibility and action is classified and weighed without the mention or facilitation of a binding and legal contract

The analysis of any or all respective liability and participation is evaluated through litigation, case review, and witness testimony with regard to a broken or breached contract

Simple Guide to Verbal Contracts

In the
United States, verbal contracts will usually refer to unwritten or oral
contracts. An unwritten contract will usually mean that the contract or
agreement was made through the use of spoken words as opposed to formally
writing and entering into record the provisions of said contract.

The United
States has laws that will recognize verbal contracts in a court of law and
enforce the agreed upon provisions in the case of a dispute. However, because
verbal contracts are oftentimes unwritten contracts, there will be inherent
problems involved in a legal dispute surrounding verbal contracts.

The most
common issue which arises is that verbal contracts are extremely hard to prove
to have ever actually occurred in the first place. Evidence such as witnesses
and an overall preponderance of evidence will be necessary to prove that a
party violated verbal contracts. Therefore, it can be deemed that unwritten
contracts, as opposed to formally written contracts, are not weighed as heavily
or given the same legal merit in a court of law due to the lack of actual
physical evidence of the contract.

What Can A Contract Software Do For You

Contract software can provide
free contract templates for individuals to use when, in the course of their
business or personal dealings, they encounter the need to form contracts. In
addition to purchasing contract software for the express purpose of creating
contracts, in many cases companies are able to obtain free contract templates
online in order to accomplish their contract creation needs. The contract software
that is used may be customized for use by a company, or the contract software
may simply be used as they are originally obtained.

Free contract templates may be
used to create a standard form contract, which are also known as a boilerplate
contract or an adhesion contract. Whether paid or free, contract templates can
save an individual or enterprise substantial amounts of time, cost, and effort
that would otherwise be associated with the creation of a contract.

Contract software can be
drafted using free contract templates to help facilitate the use of contracts
and services. Contract software which an individual or enterprise obtains can
make use of free contract templates in order to allow the party that is
drafting the contract and then offering the contract to the other party, a
resource which can help them to make the contract more likely to stand up to
scrutiny in a court of law, as well as making sure that the free contract
templates which they use will provide for their particular needs.

What You Didn’t Know About Contract Management

What is Contract Management?

Contract management, also referred to as contract administration, is the management of contracts that are created between customers, partners, vendors or employees. The field of contract management includes negotiating the terms and conditions present in these contractual agreements, while subsequently ensuring that these stipulations adhere to compliance issues designated by the underlying company or industry.

In addition, contract management entails the documenting and agreeing on all changes that may come to light during the implementation and execution of such contractual agreements.

Contract management can be best summarized as the formal process of efficiently managing the creation of a contract, along with expediting the execution and required analysis of the contract. The systematic approach of contract management is required to maximize the financial and operational capabilities and performance of the underlying parties. In addition, contract management is undertaken to mitigate the risk associated with a contractual agreement.

Contract management deals with contractual agreements that are made in a commercial setting; common forms of commercial contracts will include employment letters, purchase orders, sales invoices and utility contracts. The more complicated forms of commercial contracts will include contractual agreements regarding constructions projects, the exchange of goods or services that are regulated by a government authority or require the delivery of technical specifications, intellectual property agreements and issues revolving around international trade.

Common Areas of Contract Management:

Contract management, in the most simplistic of forms, will expedite the drawing and execution of a business contract. A business-standard contract model, as carried-out by numerous organizations throughout the United States of America will typically review and systematically inspect the following areas of business disciplines:

Baseline management

Commitment management

Authoring and negotiating the business contract

Creating a visible contract that is easily understood by both parties

Growth Contracts for sales-side contractual obligations

A contract management team will expedite the creation and delivery of numerous types of contracts, including purchasing contracts, partnership agreements, trade agreements, intellectual property agreements and sales contracts.

A purchasing contract is a legally-binding agreement between a company (the buying party) and a supplier who promises to sell products and/or services that meet the terms and conditions within the contract. The company, in return, is obligated to acknowledge the transfer of goods and services and to pay the seller for the offering.

A sales contract is a legally-binding agreement between a company (the seller) and a customer; in this contractual agreement, the company agrees to sell products or services to the customer. In return, the customer is obligated to pay for the products or services purchased.

A partnership agreement may take the form of a contract which formally establishes the terms of a partnership formation between two legal entities. A partnership agreement, in regards to contract management, may also merely reflect the desire of the parties to act is if both are forming a partnership with common goals.

Read This Before Filing A Petition of Revocation

A petition of revocation can be filed by any citizen of the United States in the event that they feel that they or others have suffered as a result of any granted permission to an entity to act. There exists a wide variety of possibilities to file a petition of revocation, which range from Federal and governmental levels to civic and commercial levels. Due to the fact that expressed permission was granted, a petition of revocation of that expressed permission must be filed in order to eradicate the expressed permission in question.

For instance, in the event that a liquor store has been suspected of selling alcohol to minors, the police, local government, or concerned citizen(s) can choose to file a petition for the revocation of that particular establishment’s license to sell alcohol.

A petition of revocation can both be filed as a suit in and of itself, or it can be added onto to a preexisting sentence. In this example, the liquor store could be fined for its misconduct, or it could be both fined in tandem with the revocation of its license.

All You Need to Know About Restatement of Contracts

The Restatement of Contracts is one of the most widely recognized and most frequently cited legal treatises that is part of jurisprudence in the United States of America. It is taught to most American law students during the first year of law school. It is the most-cited non-binding authority in common law in the United States.

The Restatement of Contracts is a peerless work in terms of overall influence and recognition among individuals on both the bar and the bench. The only possible rival for its recognition is the Restatement of Torts. The Second Edition of the Restatement of Contracts was begun in 1962, with the American Law Institute completing its compilation in 1979.

The general purpose of a restatement of the law is to allow judges and lawyers to have a general understanding of a set of treatises on legal subjects. The Restatement of Contracts allows individuals to have a general understanding of the principles of contract law. The Restatements of Contracts is one of the twenty three Restatements compiled by the American Law Institute.

The Restatement of Contracts is not legally binding, but it carries a great deal of weight and is highly persuasive because it represents the thoughts of prominent legal professors, practicing attorneys, and judges. The Restatement of Contracts is a reflective consensus reached by the American legal system and professionals, both of what the law is and, in rare cases, what the law should be.

Make Sure You Know the Basic Principles of Law of Contract

What is the Law of Contract?

As is common with the majority of legal principles, the basic fundamentals of contract law will vary by jurisdictions throughout the United States. In all jurisdictions; however, a contract must require an offer, a subsequent acceptance or agreement to the stipulations within the contract, and consideration.

These characteristics are in essence, the foundation for a document to be regarded as a legally binding and valid contract.

Basic Principles of the Law of Contract:

The law of contract states that the first step required to form a valid contract is that an offer must be formally made by one of the parties to another. A common example to elucidate upon this principle is found in the sale of property; the purchaser, in this example, must make an offer to purchase the underlying property. This offer may include simplistic or complex terms, but it must be concrete and affirmed through written documentation.

Following the offer, the contract, as stated by the law of contract, must be accepted by the offered party. Using the sale of property as an example, the seller must affirmatively accept the offer; the original offer may be accepted in a written or spoken form.

If the offered party proposes a counteroffer, an acceptance is not realized. When a court determines whether or not an offer and acceptance was realized, the judicial body using the law of contract will look for a formal meeting or a concurrence of wills to decide if the requirements latent in the offer and acceptance statutes of the law of contract had been satisfied.

Lastly, the basic principles of the law of contract will require consideration to be given for the contract to maintain a legal or valid status. Consideration simply means that something of value was exchanged between the agreeing parties. In most instances, the consideration takes the form of money or an asset that holds considerable value.

In some scenarios; however, consideration can take the form of refraining from performing a function or doing something that the party is otherwise entitled to initiate. Regardless of the form, the consideration given must be sufficient, but does not need to be adequate to validate the stipulations latent in the contract.

Court Evaluations of a Contractual Agreement:

In addition to the basic principles of the law of contract, a court system, when evaluating the validity of a contractual agreement will evaluate the capacity of the party’s when the agreement was reached. The capacity to enter into a contract may be affected by numerous factors; for instance, minors do not possess the legal capacity to enter into a contract. In addition, a person’s mental state may also be considered when evaluating whether the person had the capacity or ability to enter into a valid contract.

Numerous courts will look to the legality of a contract when determining its validity. If a contract requires an individual to do something illegal, it will be deemed void on its face.

Important Facts About The Punishment For A Breach Of Contract

The punishment for breach of contract may vary based on the laws
in each jurisdiction, as well as the type of contract involved. For
example, a contract such as a lease which is breached can include financial
penalties and possible eviction of the tenant.

Leases that are involved in a breach of contract can include
penalties for both the landlord and the tenant. If the landlord breaches the
contract, the tenant may not be required to pay rent in certain circumstances
until the contract is being honored. For example, tenants may not have to pay
rent if there is no heat or air conditioning when the temperature reaches a
certain level because the landlord has breached the contract.

In contrast, tenants may be evicted if they are guilty of a breach
of contract and fail to pay the rent on time.

Government Files Lawsuit against Fluor Companies

On November 8, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that the United States government is intervening in a case against Fluor Corporation and its subsidiary, Fluor Hanford Inc, after the Texas-based companies used federal funds for lobbying activity. The lawsuit for violations of the False Claims Act was first filed by a whistleblower, Loydene Rambo.

According to the Justice Department, Fluor had a contract with the Department of Energy (DOE) for multiple services at the Hanford Nuclear Site in Washington State between 1999 and 2008. The facility is federally funded.

According to the original complaint, part of the DOE contract stated that Fluor could not use the federal funds for lobbying. The whistle blower’s complaint alleged that Fluor used the funds for lobbying from 2005 to 2008 anyway. The company hired two lobbying firms, Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC, to lobby members of Congress and federal agencies.

The United States has agreed to intervene in the case against Fluor, but the government will not intervene in cases against Secure Horizons LLC and Congressional Strategies LLC. Since Ms. Rambo filed the lawsuit under the False Claims Act, she can share a percentage of the recovery with the United States government.

Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, stated: “The taxpayer money Congress allocated for this program was for training federal emergency response personnel and first responders, not to lobby Congress and other for more funding. When public funds are misused, as alleged in this case, the Justice Department will work to restore them to the Treasury.”

The Civil Division of the Justice Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Washington are handling the case and receiving assistance from the Department of Energy Office of Inspector General.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

Contract Law