Facebook
Home Contract Law

Contract Law

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

  
Promissory estoppel is one of the broad categories of reliance-based estoppels. Promissory estoppel is differentiated from the other two forms of reliance-based estoppel, estoppel by representation of fact and proprietary estoppel, in that promissory estoppel applies where one person makes a promise to another person, but there is no contract that can be enforced to make the person carry out the promised action.


In order for promissory estoppel to apply, the party that has been victimized must prove in court that there was both an inducement and a detrimental reliance. In other words, there has to be evidence that one party intended for the victim to act on the promise or representation, or the victim must satisfy the court that their actions were a reasonable response to the relevant promise or representation. 


The victim must also show that the actions that the victim engaged in were either reasonable or were the intended response to the representation made, and that the victim would suffer a loss or detriment at the current moment  in the event the other party were permitted to be released from the assumed obligation. For the courts to find that promissory estoppel applies it must be shown that it would be unconscionable to allow the party to benefit from their actions.


Promissory estoppel and estoppel by representation of fact are mutually exclusive concepts. Estoppel by representation of fact is based on a representation of some mixture of law and fact, while promissory estoppel is based on a promise to fail to exercise a previously existing right.

Your Guide to Understanding Contract Management Software

Your Guide to Understanding Contract Management Software

What is Contract Management?
Contract management, is the management of contracts that are created between customers, partners, vendors or employees. The field of contract management includes negotiating the terms and conditions present in these contractual agreements, while subsequently ensuring that stipulations within the contract adhere to compliance issues designated by the underlying company or industry.
In addition, contract management entails the documenting and agreeing on all changes that may come to light during the implementation and execution of such contractual agreements. 
Contract management can be best summarized as the formal process of efficiently managing the creation of a contract, along with expediting the execution and required analysis of the contract. The systematic approach of contract management is required to maximize the financial and operational capabilities and performance of the underlying parties. In addition, contract management is undertaken to mitigate the risk associated with a contractual agreement.
Contract management deals with contractual agreements that are made in a commercial setting; common forms of commercial contracts will include employment letters, purchase orders, sales invoices and utility contracts.
The more complicated forms of commercial contracts will include contractual agreements regarding constructions projects, the exchange of goods or services that are regulated by a government authority or require the delivery of technical specifications, intellectual property agreements and issues revolving around international trade. 

Contract Management Software:
The majority of large corporations in the United States, actively manage and maintain nearly 50,000 contracts at any given time. The majority of these contracts, are managed in a tradition or manual sense; however, approximately one quarter of such companies have recently implemented a form of contract management software to expedite the management of such contracts. 
Contract management software is an automate program to help streamline the creation and negotiation of a business contract; contract management software achieves such functions through compliance and renewal and through exhaustive monitoring of the underlying contracts. Contract management software requires the programs to maintain a corporate contract, to improve a respect companyā€™s access and visibility in regards to the control of contracts. 
The majority of contract management software will also enable the corporation to create and observe warehouse standard contracts and business terms and conditions for such contracts through various templates. Other forms of business contract management software will utilize a Service Lifecycle management program, which will bundle contract management with all other forms of management in relation to service-based operations. 
This function enables the contract management software to improve the companyā€™s customer retention; through these various functions, the average piece of contract management software will allow companies to better achieve savings during procurement negotiations and procurement spending. In addition, contract management software, will enable the using corporation to improve sales effectiveness and increase compliance by allowing contracts to ultimately drive day-to-day operations. 

Contract vs. Agreement

Contract vs. Agreement

The essential differences between a contract and an agreement are minor. In essence, a contractā€™s outline is more formal and more rigidly presented than the terms outlined in an agreement.
A contract is a legally binding agreement reached between two parties, the terms of which the courts have the authority and obligation to enforce. An agreement is a less formal creation of an obligation between the two parties.
An agreement usually lacks one or more of the essential elements that are required to be present in order to form a valid contract that will be considered legally enforceable by a court of law.
Contracts outline the terms of the relationship that should be formed between the two parties to the contract. An agreement also outlines the terms of the relationship between the two. However, the difference is that the contractā€™s outline is far more rigid than that of a contract.
The essential difference between an agreement and a contract is that typically an agreement will only modify a contract that is already in place but does not place an obligation on either one of the parties to provide consideration to the other party, which a contract requires. A contract can involve the exchange of promises between the parties to the contract, while an agreement may simply involve one party accepting the offer from another party.

Offers Explained

Offers Explained

According to U.S. legal theory, advertisements are not generally considered offers in the sense of being legally binding and applicable toward the establishment of contractual agreements. As such, offers which do possess legal force under the theory and practice of contract law must include, among other things, an individual whom is specifically targeted and can accordingly be identified as an ā€œoffereeā€. 
Additionally, advertisements are excluded from the legal definition of offers due to their absence of another component: legally binding terms included in the offers. Advertisements, to this end, may be identified under legal terminology not as
offers but, rather, as invitations. 
Advertisements are thus not offers in their most basic form, but may possibly be designated as such if additional terms are added to the advertisement, such as offering special incentives for people to take advantage of a service. Otherwise, advertisements cannot be litigated in the same way as offers.

Find Out What Meeting of the Minds Means

Find Out What Meeting of the Minds Means

One of the essential tenets of contract law is that in order for a legal and valid contract to be formed in the eyes of the courts, there must be a ā€œmeeting of the mindsā€ between the parties forming the contract. The parties to the contract can be individuals, or a legal entity can be entered into a contract by an official in a position of power in the legal entity.
However, establishing the existence of a meeting of the minds is very difficult for the courts to determine. If there is any dispute about the terms of a contract before a meeting of the minds develops, the courts will show a preference to interpret the terms of the contract in a way which does the least harm or damage to all the parties involved.
A meeting of the minds may also be found to not exist if the contract fails a ā€œreasonable manā€ test. The reasonable man test is that a normal person with the range of knowledge that a person of a similar background to the person disputing some or all of the terms of the contract, would have reasonably interpreted the contract in a particular manner. The reasonable man test can be influenced by the specific individuals who are involved in the contract at issue.

Important Facts to Know When Refusing To Sign A Contract

Important Facts to Know When Refusing To Sign A Contract

Contact law encompasses a variety of types of contacts. In many cases, the rules and laws apply to all contracts. However, there are some specific laws which only apply to certain contracts.
For example, if an individual refuses to sign an updated contract, the repercussions would depend on the type of contract. In some cases, there is no recourse if individuals refuse to sign an updated contract, and the other party could in fact be charged with breach of contract if they refuse to honor the old contract.
For example, employers that distribute a new contract may request that all employees sign it. If an employee refuses to do so, they are still under the old contract. If that employee were terminated based on the new contract, the employer could be charged with breach of contract for the original contract.
 

Act for the Prevention of Frauds

Act for the Prevention of Frauds

The Act for the Prevention of
Frauds and Perjuries was an English law established in 1677 in order to prevent
perjuries in regards to legal contracts and agreements. It is from the Act for
the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries that the Statute of Frauds was taken.

The Statute of Frauds is a
legal policy that requires certain contracts to be created in written form.
Unlike many agreements, these specified contracts are not legally binding
unless a written contract is created to regulate and govern these agreements.

Many agreements are covered
under the Statute of Frauds, including contracts related to marriages and real
estate transactions. This policy, which was initially detailed in the Act for
the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries, continues to be used in many locations
today. In the United States, certain agreements cannot be considered legally
binding unless they are accompanied by a written contract.
 

Verbal Contract V. Written Contract

Verbal Contract V. Written Contract

Contract law in the legal context of the United States generally allows for a contract which is called into being by the exchange of verbal expressions to be as valid as one which is set forth in writing. This general provision for a verbal contract may, however, be modified in certain jurisdictions by specific contract law requirements for a contract to be set down in specific circumstances and toward specific ends. Moreover, contract law for an area may or may not provide for the difficulties which can arise in carrying out a verbal contract. 
The lack of a written contract can present problems in terms of the lack of proof as to what was agreed to under contract law. As such, judges administering contract law may be forced to apply a standard of fairness in order to resolve the contract dispute. In this way, a verbal contract, while valid, may not be effective.

Understand Your Rights As An Employee

Understand Your Rights As An Employee

What are Employee Rights?
Employee rights are the personal freedoms and privileges given to individuals who work in the United States, as well as other developed nations. Employee rights are affirmed through employment laws; in a general sense, employee rights are awarded to working individuals to protect their interests and safety in the workplace. 
The most basic and fundamental employee rights will offer the working individual the right to time off work, to contribute work without harassment, and the right to receive minimum as well as overtime pay. Those individuals who work and who do not receive such employee rights possess the ability to file lawsuits against their respective employers. If found guilty of violating these basic employee rights, the underlying employer will be forced to provide the respective employee with monetary compensation and punitive damages. 
Employee rights take the form of both state and federal laws; each individual state posts its own minimum wage scale that must abide by the federal scale enacted by the United States government. Employee rights regarding overtime, although up to the discretion of the particular employer, must also meet the federal guidelines instituted by the United States government.
All employees, except for those exempt such as salaried supervisors, are entitled to compensation for hours worked beyond the hours required in the individualā€™s particular employment contract. 

Minimum Wage:
Another fundamental employee right is the right to earn a minimum wage. It is illegal, based on employee rights and coordinating employment laws, to pay individuals below the federal and local minimum wage level. No state may pay employers below the national minimum wage right, although the potential for workers in the service industry to collect tips, does enable an employer to pay a wage lower than the national level. 


Time off Work:
Employee rights mandate that all employers allow their respective employees to take time off from work. The reasons for requesting time off can include the need for a vacation, family emergencies or medical leave. Regardless of the reason, an employer must satisfy this basic employee right; the amount of time off will vary based on company and the stipulations which elucidate on time off will be documented in the employment contract. 

Workplace Rights:
All employees possess the right to enjoy a workplace that is free from harassment. Basic employee rights will protect workers against sexual harassment or harassment fueled by age, race or gender discrimination. If a worker is being harassed, the individual has the right to file claims with an administrative body to initiate the filing of a civil suit. 

Oral Contract Vs Implied Contract?

Oral Contract Vs Implied Contract?

According to contract law, an oral contract is not considered an implied contract. An oral contract is an agreement that is agreed upon only by spoken communication. Although an oral contract originates from the mouth, it is common for a written contract to be created after the oral contract is stated.
In contract law, oral contracts are considered just as valid as written contracts. Some jurisdictions require that a contract be written up after an oral contract is made. Within this type of circumstance, the document must state that the original agreement was created verbally. 
An implied contract is an agreement that is not generally agreed upon. Instead, it is something that is more assumed to be followed. An example of this type of contract would be an employment contract where the employer does not specify hours but does specify the total amount of time required to be worked. 
123...5Page 1 of 5
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X