Contract vs. Agreement






The Act for the Prevention of
Frauds and Perjuries was an English law established in 1677 in order to prevent
perjuries in regards to legal contracts and agreements. It is from the Act for
the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries that the Statute of Frauds was taken.
The Statute of Frauds is a
legal policy that requires certain contracts to be created in written form.
Unlike many agreements, these specified contracts are not legally binding
unless a written contract is created to regulate and govern these agreements.
Many agreements are covered
under the Statute of Frauds, including contracts related to marriages and real
estate transactions. This policy, which was initially detailed in the Act for
the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries, continues to be used in many locations
today. In the United States, certain agreements cannot be considered legally
binding unless they are accompanied by a written contract.




The underlying philosophical approach to contract law is pacta
sunt servanda. Pacta sunt servanda is a Latin phrase that
can be literally translated as âPacts must be kept,â but is more commonly and
colloquially translated to mean âagreements are to be kept.â This phrase is the
essential theory behind contract law. However, pacta sunt servanda only
applies if the contract that is formed is a legally valid one.
One of the most essential
aspects used to determine if a contract is valid or not is if there is a
legally recognized offer and acceptance. The focus on offer and acceptance is
the traditional approach to analyzing whether an agreement is present between
the two parties who are in a contract dispute.
When measuring whether there is
a sufficient agreement between the two parties, there must be an offer and
acceptance. The offer is the terms that are presented to the âoffereeâ by the
âofferorâ. In order for a contract to be formed, the offer must be accepted
unconditionally.
If the initial âoffereeâ makes any changes to the terms
presented to them by the offeror, then there cannot be offer and acceptance at
that point, for the individuals have immediately swapped position. This new
offer, and acceptance of the new terms, may result in agreement, however. The
difference is largely technical, and only becomes an issue if there is a contractual
dispute between the parties.
