Facebook
Home Contract Law Page 2

Contract Law

All You Need to Know About Restatement of Contracts

All You Need to Know About Restatement of Contracts

The Restatement of Contracts is one of the most widely recognized and most frequently cited legal treatises that is part of jurisprudence in the United States of America. It is taught to most American law students during the first year of law school. It is the most-cited non-binding authority in common law in the United States.
The Restatement of Contracts is a peerless work in terms of overall influence and recognition among individuals on both the bar and the bench. The only possible rival for its recognition is the Restatement of Torts. The Second Edition of the Restatement of Contracts was begun in 1962, with the American Law Institute completing its compilation in 1979.
The general purpose of a restatement of the law is to allow judges and lawyers to have a general understanding of a set of treatises on legal subjects. The Restatement of Contracts allows individuals to have a general understanding of the principles of contract law. The Restatements of Contracts is one of the twenty three Restatements compiled by the American Law Institute.
The Restatement of Contracts is not legally binding, but it carries a great deal of weight and is highly persuasive because it represents the thoughts of prominent legal professors, practicing attorneys, and judges. The Restatement of Contracts is a reflective consensus reached by the American legal system and professionals, both of what the law is and, in rare cases, what the law should be.

What Are Contracts

What Are Contracts

What is a contract?
 
 
A contract agreement is a legally binding agreement that is reached between two parties under which the two parties to the contract agree to assume an obligation to each other and provide methods of remediation through the courts in the event there is a dispute about whether or not each party upheld their obligation. 
 
 
Contracts law cases 
 
 
Contracts law is one of the major sections of common law. Some of the most prominent contract law cases have been developed over the past several hundred years. The most prominent and influential of these contract law cases have been compiled to create the Restatement of Contracts.
 
 
Meeting of the minds
 
 
A meeting of the minds is one of the essential elements of forming a valid contract. Meeting of the minds means that both parties to the contract have agreed to the terms of the contract. It can be difficult for the courts to determine if a meeting of the minds has been conclusively established. 
 
 
Deed poll
 
 
A deed poll is a legal document that binds a single party to take an action. It is different from a contract in that while a contract expresses a promise, a deed poll only expresses an intention to act. A deed of poll is commonly used in England, Wales, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Hong Kong, and Singapore. 
 
 
Contract templates
 
 
Contract templates can be used to form a general contract. A contract template may also be used to ensure that the terms of the contract are equitable to all parties involved. 
 
 
Offer and acceptance
 
 
The underlying concept behind contract law is pacta sunt servanda. Pacta sunt servanda is a Latin phrase which is translated as agreements are to be kept. However, this only applies to legally valid contracts. One of the main methods of determining when a contract is valid is by determining if offer and acceptance has taken place. In the eyes of the law, the offer and acceptance is only valid if there is not a change to the offer and acceptance is unequivocal. 
 
 
Consideration 
 
 
Consideration is the item of value that is exchanged in a contract. Contract law is not concerned about whether or not the consideration being exchanged is of equal value. All that matters is that the consideration cannot be inconsequential.
 
 
Contract termination
 
 
A contract termination letter template can be an important resource for a company since it can help to make sure that the contract termination letter is legally valid and does not violate any laws when the contract termination letter is served. The contract termination letter should provide the reason the contract is being terminated, as well as the legal justification for the contract termination. 
 
 
Boilerplate contract
 
 
A boilerplate contract, adhesion contract, or standard form contract are all synonymous terms for a contract in which the terms of the contract are drafted ahead of time. Part of the controversy behind a boilerplate contract or adhesion contract is that it may not be possible to access the terms of the contract before signing the contract, since it may be on a “take it or leave it” basis. 
 
 
Sample contracts 
 
 
Sample contract forms can help individuals form a boilerplate contract, although standard contracts may also be formed from contract forms for the sale of goods, to create employment contracts, or to create a standard contract that can be used with minimal customization and involvement of lawyers.
 
 
Uniform Commercial Code 
 
 
The Uniform Commercial Code, abbreviated as the UCC, is a legal document that is meant to serve as a guideline for states to align with their contract laws in order to facilitate commerce. In one form or another the Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted in all fifty states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, Louisiana has not adopted Article 2 of the UCC. 
 
 
Contract software
 
 
Contract software to create free contract templates can be found widely online. These free contract templates can be used for personal or commercial business. Contract software can be distinct products or may be add-ons to existing software. 
 
 
Contract vs. agreement
 
 
While a contract forms a binding relationship between two parties, an agreement involves a relationship that cannot be enforced by the courts. Contracts outline the obligations that are being assumed, although contracts outline the remedies if these obligations are not met. 
 
 
Restatement of Contracts
 
 
The Restatement of Contracts is a widely respected legal treatise. The Restatement of Contracts is compiled by the American Law Institute. 
 
 
Privity of contract 
 
 
Privity of contract is the concept that only the two parties that form business contracts can sue to collect benefits from the violation of a contract.
 

Contract vs. Agreement

Contract vs. Agreement

The essential differences between a contract and an agreement are minor. In essence, a contract’s outline is more formal and more rigidly presented than the terms outlined in an agreement.
A contract is a legally binding agreement reached between two parties, the terms of which the courts have the authority and obligation to enforce. An agreement is a less formal creation of an obligation between the two parties.
An agreement usually lacks one or more of the essential elements that are required to be present in order to form a valid contract that will be considered legally enforceable by a court of law.
Contracts outline the terms of the relationship that should be formed between the two parties to the contract. An agreement also outlines the terms of the relationship between the two. However, the difference is that the contract’s outline is far more rigid than that of a contract.
The essential difference between an agreement and a contract is that typically an agreement will only modify a contract that is already in place but does not place an obligation on either one of the parties to provide consideration to the other party, which a contract requires. A contract can involve the exchange of promises between the parties to the contract, while an agreement may simply involve one party accepting the offer from another party.

Quick and Easy Contract Law Cases

Quick and Easy Contract Law Cases

 

 
Contract law cases can be classified under the general law of obligations. The general category of the Law of Obligations includes Torts Law, Unjust Enrichment Law, and Restitution Law, besides Contracts Law.
 
 
One of the most famous contract law cases is the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. Although this case of contracts law is included in English contract law cases, the relevant principles of contracts law in the English system were adapted to the American courts.
 
 
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is one of the most famous contract law cases since it involved a manufacturer who offered a flu remedy called a “carbolic smoke ball.” The makers of the smoke ball, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, advertised in a newspaper that buyers who developed the flu despite using the smoke ball properly would be given 100 Pounds as a refund. 
 
 
The Company claimed that the advertisement was not a serious offer, but the judges in the case ruled that because there was a statement from the company that they had deposited money in an account so that they would be able to make the payments if there were any claims, a reasonable person had cause to believe that there was a sincere offer, thus meeting the requirement that there be an offer and acceptance to form a contract.

 

Contract In Depth

Contract In Depth

A contract is a legal document which may be enforceable by legal action or by binding arbitration. In order for this to be true, however, the contract agreement must meet several important requirements. 
There must be a compensatory remedy for the contract under which the party which defaults is required to pay monetary compensation that would have otherwise been provided had the contract agreement been upheld, or an equitable remedy, which can also be called Specific Performance. The equitable remedy, or specific performance, compels an individual who enters into a contract agreement to carry out the action against which they have attempted to renege on their obligation. 
In order for a contract to be valid, the contract must involve unqualified, or “mirror”, acceptance. In order for a contract agreement to be valid, all parties must have the capacity to contract, and the terms of the contract cannot be trifling, indeterminate, or impossible. In the eyes of the law, a contract cannot be entered into to compel illegal action.
Although a contract is usually written in order to compel action, a contract agreement can also be created which will prevent a person from performing an act which they have the legal capacity to perform.
If a contract agreement is breached, legal remedies may be provided to address that breach.
Contract law, the legal field that specializes in the legal disposition of contracts and contract agreements, generally adheres to the Latin motto “pacta sunt servana,” meaning “pacts [agreements] must be kept.”

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

  
Promissory estoppel is one of the broad categories of reliance-based estoppels. Promissory estoppel is differentiated from the other two forms of reliance-based estoppel, estoppel by representation of fact and proprietary estoppel, in that promissory estoppel applies where one person makes a promise to another person, but there is no contract that can be enforced to make the person carry out the promised action.


In order for promissory estoppel to apply, the party that has been victimized must prove in court that there was both an inducement and a detrimental reliance. In other words, there has to be evidence that one party intended for the victim to act on the promise or representation, or the victim must satisfy the court that their actions were a reasonable response to the relevant promise or representation. 


The victim must also show that the actions that the victim engaged in were either reasonable or were the intended response to the representation made, and that the victim would suffer a loss or detriment at the current moment  in the event the other party were permitted to be released from the assumed obligation. For the courts to find that promissory estoppel applies it must be shown that it would be unconscionable to allow the party to benefit from their actions.


Promissory estoppel and estoppel by representation of fact are mutually exclusive concepts. Estoppel by representation of fact is based on a representation of some mixture of law and fact, while promissory estoppel is based on a promise to fail to exercise a previously existing right.

All You Need to Know On How to Revise a Policy

All You Need to Know On How to Revise a Policy

A policy, by definition, is a set of principles or rules that are implemented for the purpose of obtaining or reaching a particular outcome or goal. Therefore, policies, in essence, exist in a variety of endless contexts.
Though a policy may be implemented for a particular time achieving the intended purpose, it may prove necessary to amend or revise a policy. Revising a policy can take various routes.
Revising a policy will usually be at the discretion of the entities or parties that implement the policy in the first place. In devising a policy, it is common that procedures in the changing or revising of the policy be included for future reference or circumstance. Each individual policy that exists and the actual actions or procedures involved in revising a policy will differ in accordance to the needs of the faction or party and the changes that are to take place.

Simple Guide to Verbal Contracts

Simple Guide to Verbal Contracts

In the
United States, verbal contracts will usually refer to unwritten or oral
contracts. An unwritten contract will usually mean that the contract or
agreement was made through the use of spoken words as opposed to formally
writing and entering into record the provisions of said contract.

The United
States has laws that will recognize verbal contracts in a court of law and
enforce the agreed upon provisions in the case of a dispute. However, because
verbal contracts are oftentimes unwritten contracts, there will be inherent
problems involved in a legal dispute surrounding verbal contracts.

The most
common issue which arises is that verbal contracts are extremely hard to prove
to have ever actually occurred in the first place. Evidence such as witnesses
and an overall preponderance of evidence will be necessary to prove that a
party violated verbal contracts. Therefore, it can be deemed that unwritten
contracts, as opposed to formally written contracts, are not weighed as heavily
or given the same legal merit in a court of law due to the lack of actual
physical evidence of the contract.

Quick Blurb on Contract Laws

Quick Blurb on Contract Laws

Contract law is the legal
specialty that addresses the creation and execution of contracts. The rules and
regulations established in contract law indicate that a contract is a legally
binding document. Therefore, once a contract is signed by all participating
parties, these individuals are legally obligated to adhere to the conditions
outlined in the contract.

Following the authorization of
the contract, a participating party cannot choose to alter the contract. The
terms and conditions of the contract can only be altered or modified if all
parties agree to the changes. In the event that this occurs, a new contract
will need to be created. 

The new contract will detail any modifications made to
the original contract. However, if one participating party opposed the alteration
of the original contract, then the contract cannot be modified. The party who
wanted to alter the contract conditions will be required to adhere to the terms
of the original contract.

 

Important Facts to Know When Refusing To Sign A Contract

Important Facts to Know When Refusing To Sign A Contract

Contact law encompasses a variety of types of contacts. In many cases, the rules and laws apply to all contracts. However, there are some specific laws which only apply to certain contracts.
For example, if an individual refuses to sign an updated contract, the repercussions would depend on the type of contract. In some cases, there is no recourse if individuals refuse to sign an updated contract, and the other party could in fact be charged with breach of contract if they refuse to honor the old contract.
For example, employers that distribute a new contract may request that all employees sign it. If an employee refuses to do so, they are still under the old contract. If that employee were terminated based on the new contract, the employer could be charged with breach of contract for the original contract.
 
123...5Page 2 of 5
Facebook

EVEN MORE NEWS

POPULAR CATEGORY

©