Home Compromise

Compromise

Missouri Compromise of 1820

Missouri Compromise of 1820

 

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an important compromise in the history of America. It played a significant role in the relationship between the North and the South in the time leading up to the American Civil War. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a compromise primarily focused on how slavery would be dealt with in the expanding United States.

As new western territories were added to America, the question arose as to whether or not they would fall under the sway of the North, and thus, be considered anti-slavery, or if they would have legalized slavery as it did the American South. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 thus set out that slavery was utterly illegal above the 36th north parallel line with the exception being the State of Missouri, which had not actually been made a state yet, but had been proposed as a state at the time of the Compromise of 1820.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 actually came from a series of different bills and Amendments which were tied together into the single Compromise. The northern states were looking to admit Maine as a state into the Union, with Maine being an abolitionist state in which slavery would be illegal. Doing so would unbalance the equality of the two sides, however, as the North would then have more states than the South. 

As such, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was designed to allow Missouri to be a slave state so that the two sides would remain equal. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact Missouri lawyers.

 

What Happened At The Compromise of 1877

What Happened At The Compromise of 1877

 

The Compromise of 1877 was a compromise
designed to end the controversy that had surrounded the election of 1876. The
election of 1876 stands out as one of the most controversial and close
elections in the history of America, as the election ultimately came down to
Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, with 165 electoral votes, and
Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic candidate, with 184 votes. 

There were 20 votes
remaining which had not been given to either of these candidates, which came
from Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. The controversy of the election
came from the fact that the Democrats claimed that Tilden had won in those
states and the Republicans claimed that Hayes had won in those states.

The Compromise of 1877 only
added to the controversy of the election, as it involved Tilden agreeing to
give Hayes the election on the grounds that Hayes would take particular action
as President. Specifically, Tilden wanted Hayes to remove any remaining Federal
troops which had been stationed in the former Confederate states of the south,
such as Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida.

The Compromise of 1877 also
included terms under which Hayes would be obligated to construct a
transcontinental railroad in the south and help to industrialize the south. In
exchange for the promises Hayes made in the Compromise of 1877, Tilden was
willing to give up the Presidency. The exact historical truthfulness of the
Compromise of 1877, to the point where Tilden and Hayes made these deals,
remains somewhat questionable, as the actual issue was ultimately solved by a
vote of Congress.  

Uncover the Facts Behind the Crittenden Compromise

Uncover the Facts Behind the Crittenden Compromise

The Crittenden Compromise was
an attempt at a compromise which would prevent the secession of the Southern
states from the United States of America in 1860. The Crittenden Compromise
ultimately failed, however, as the secession of those Southern states and the
Civil War followed shortly after the Compromise’s proposal.

The Crittenden Compromise was
named after the Senator who proposed it, John J. Crittenden. The Crittenden
Compromise was an attempt to make many concessions to the South, such that the
Southern states would not have grounds for secession anymore. As such, the
Crittenden Compromise codified and would have made permanent a number of
important elements of America at the time.

For example, the Crittenden
Compromise included six different Constitutional Amendments and four proposed
resolutions to be passed by Congress. These would make slavery a permanent
institution ratified in the Constitution. Furthermore, the Crittenden
Compromise would make permanent the dividing line set out in the Missouri
Compromise, such that slavery would always be legal south of the 36th parallel north and would be illegal north of
that line.

The Crittenden Compromise would
also have prevented Congress from interfering with slavery in any significant
fashion, whether through interstate trade or through future Amendments and
proclamation. The Crittenden Compromise would have enforced fugitive slave
laws, thus assuring southern slave owners that runaway slaves would be returned
to them instead of being set free in the northern, abolitionist states.

Ultimately, the Crittenden
Compromise failed due to a number of factors, one of the most important of
which was the Presidency of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln immediately dismissed the
terms of the Crittenden Compromise which was seen as contributing to the
secession of the South and the Civil War.

Understanding A Compromise Agreement

Understanding A Compromise Agreement

A compromise agreement might in
a general sense be used to refer to the documentation which enforces a given compromise,
but in a more specific sense, it refers to a type of contract prevalent in the
United Kingdom. Compromise agreements are contracts between employers and
employees which are designed to ensure that the employee receives some amount
of restitution from the employer in exchange for the employee renouncing any
claim to further funds and any claim to an additional obligation from the
employer.

Most often compromise
agreements are instituted in situations when the employer has breached some
element of United Kingdom law or statute, such that the employee does have a
significant claim upon the employer of funds or of some other obligation.

The
compromise agreement would discharge this debt in a fashion potentially less
costly to the employer and most likely much more quickly than a full court
proceeding.

Compromise agreements may
sometimes be undesirable for the involved parties, particularly for the
employees who might have been harmed by the breach on the part of the employer,
but they will often have benefits for both sides. An employer who goes into a
compromise agreement will know that the issue will be wholly discharged with
the completion of the compromise agreement because the employee will have
signed a waiver saying that he or she has no more claim upon the issue. The
employee will also receive a clear monetary sum in exchange for this
renunciation, which he or she might not otherwise be able to obtain through
court proceedings against the employer.

Atlanta Compromise Revealed Here

Atlanta Compromise Revealed Here

 

The Atlanta Compromise was not a compromise in the same way that many of the other famous compromises throughout American history were compromises. This is because the Atlanta Compromise was actually the name of a speech given by Booker T. Washington in 1895 at the Atlanta Cotton States and International Exposition. 

The Atlanta Compromise thus was not an actual compromise proposed for Congressional legislation or any kind of legal enforcement. 

The name of the Atlanta Compromise was selected by Booker T. Washington himself for the speech. The Atlanta Compromise is considered to have been one of the most important speeches in the history of America.

The Atlanta Compromise speech involved Booker T. Washington touching on a number of different issues with the primary focus on the issue of the treatment of the black population of the South. In his Atlanta Compromise speech, Booker T. Washington focused on the fact that the progress, success, and development of the South depended entirely upon its treatment of its black population, as the black population could either hold the South back from moving forward or it could spur the South into the greatest ranks of progress and success.

Backer T. Washington pointed out in the Atlanta Compromise that the black population should be employed before new immigrants were brought into the country and employed because the black population was already here and willing to work. Furthermore, Booker T. Washington pointed out in the Atlanta Compromise that it was more important for the black population to work fairly and equally now that they have the full range of benefits and treatments afforded to the white population. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact Atlanta lawyers.

 

Know Your Facts About Offer in Compromise

Know Your Facts About Offer in Compromise

An offer in compromise is a particular type of contract or discharge of obligation which is available to certain American taxpayers through the Offer in Compromise program associated with the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS Offer in Compromise program allows for some individuals who meet the necessary requirements of the IRS Offer in Compromise program to pay off their debts in a smaller sum than the actual full amount of the debt if they are unable to pay the full amount of the debt.

The point of the IRS Offer in Compromise program is to allow individuals to pay off their debts voluntarily in the best fashion available to them, as this is likely better for both the IRS and the party in question than would be simply continuing to fail to pay debts on the part of the debtor and pursuing payments on the part of the IRS.

In order to qualify for the IRS Offer in Compromise program, one must do one of the following: be able to show that there is some reasonable amount of doubt that the IRS has charged him or her the correct amount of tax liability; prove that he or she will never be able to provide the IRS with the full amount of the debt at any likely point in the future; or prove that paying off the debt would leave the debtor in a state of significant economic hardship. If the debtor falls into any one of these categories, then he or she may apply for the IRS Offer in Compromise program.