Home Compromise

Compromise

What Happened At The Compromise of 1877

What Happened At The Compromise of 1877

 

The Compromise of 1877 was a compromise
designed to end the controversy that had surrounded the election of 1876. The
election of 1876 stands out as one of the most controversial and close
elections in the history of America, as the election ultimately came down to
Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, with 165 electoral votes, and
Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic candidate, with 184 votes. 

There were 20 votes
remaining which had not been given to either of these candidates, which came
from Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. The controversy of the election
came from the fact that the Democrats claimed that Tilden had won in those
states and the Republicans claimed that Hayes had won in those states.

The Compromise of 1877 only
added to the controversy of the election, as it involved Tilden agreeing to
give Hayes the election on the grounds that Hayes would take particular action
as President. Specifically, Tilden wanted Hayes to remove any remaining Federal
troops which had been stationed in the former Confederate states of the south,
such as Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida.

The Compromise of 1877 also
included terms under which Hayes would be obligated to construct a
transcontinental railroad in the south and help to industrialize the south. In
exchange for the promises Hayes made in the Compromise of 1877, Tilden was
willing to give up the Presidency. The exact historical truthfulness of the
Compromise of 1877, to the point where Tilden and Hayes made these deals,
remains somewhat questionable, as the actual issue was ultimately solved by a
vote of Congress.  

Easy Overview of a Compromise

Easy Overview of a Compromise

A compromise, in the most open or general sense, is an agreement made on a given issue in which the parties involved in the issue agree to certain terms which neither one might find absolutely optimal, but which are ultimately likely to be best for two differing parties.
For example, a compromise might arise when two political parties are standing off against one another within a political system and cannot agree on whether or not a given piece of legislation should pass into law. They might compromise on changing the legislation, such that both parties are mollified, if not entirely happy with the compromise in question.
Compromising is one of the most important elements of modern politics and indeed of any kind of argumentation or debate. Compromising in politics and negotiations has thus led to the formation of many famous documents and pieces of legislation which bear the title of “Compromise” to indicate that both parties agreed to the terms set forth in the document.
There have been many famous instances of compromising in the legal or political sense throughout history, particularly in American history. Some of these compromises are still ultimately considered less than ideal, but at the time they were likely the best option available. For example, the Three Fifths Compromise was a compromise which was put into place in 1787 into the Constitution, as the North and South of America could not agree on exactly how slaves should be counted for purposes of representation.
This agreement thus involved the differing sides compromising on the issue, although again, when viewed from the perspective of today this compromise is still considered wholly inadequate for how it dehumanizes slaves and effectively legitimizes slavery.  

Understanding A Compromise Agreement

Understanding A Compromise Agreement

A compromise agreement might in
a general sense be used to refer to the documentation which enforces a given compromise,
but in a more specific sense, it refers to a type of contract prevalent in the
United Kingdom. Compromise agreements are contracts between employers and
employees which are designed to ensure that the employee receives some amount
of restitution from the employer in exchange for the employee renouncing any
claim to further funds and any claim to an additional obligation from the
employer.

Most often compromise
agreements are instituted in situations when the employer has breached some
element of United Kingdom law or statute, such that the employee does have a
significant claim upon the employer of funds or of some other obligation.

The
compromise agreement would discharge this debt in a fashion potentially less
costly to the employer and most likely much more quickly than a full court
proceeding.

Compromise agreements may
sometimes be undesirable for the involved parties, particularly for the
employees who might have been harmed by the breach on the part of the employer,
but they will often have benefits for both sides. An employer who goes into a
compromise agreement will know that the issue will be wholly discharged with
the completion of the compromise agreement because the employee will have
signed a waiver saying that he or she has no more claim upon the issue. The
employee will also receive a clear monetary sum in exchange for this
renunciation, which he or she might not otherwise be able to obtain through
court proceedings against the employer.

Know Your Facts About Offer in Compromise

Know Your Facts About Offer in Compromise

An offer in compromise is a particular type of contract or discharge of obligation which is available to certain American taxpayers through the Offer in Compromise program associated with the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS Offer in Compromise program allows for some individuals who meet the necessary requirements of the IRS Offer in Compromise program to pay off their debts in a smaller sum than the actual full amount of the debt if they are unable to pay the full amount of the debt.

The point of the IRS Offer in Compromise program is to allow individuals to pay off their debts voluntarily in the best fashion available to them, as this is likely better for both the IRS and the party in question than would be simply continuing to fail to pay debts on the part of the debtor and pursuing payments on the part of the IRS.

In order to qualify for the IRS Offer in Compromise program, one must do one of the following: be able to show that there is some reasonable amount of doubt that the IRS has charged him or her the correct amount of tax liability; prove that he or she will never be able to provide the IRS with the full amount of the debt at any likely point in the future; or prove that paying off the debt would leave the debtor in a state of significant economic hardship. If the debtor falls into any one of these categories, then he or she may apply for the IRS Offer in Compromise program.

 

 

The Compromise of 1850

The Compromise of 1850

The Compromise of 1850 was an
important compromise from American history which was made in order to prevent
more conflict between the Northern and Southern states of America. The Compromise
of 1850 came after the two year Mexican American War which ended in 1848, during
which tensions between the North and the South had been rising steadily. 

In
fact, without the Compromise of 1850 it is possible that the South would have
seceded from the Union in 1850 instead of seceding in 1861. Thus, the
Compromise of 1850 staved off the Civil War for some time, although ultimately
one could consider it ineffectual in that the Civil War did still come.

The Compromise of 1850 had a
number of important provisions which were in favor of either given side and
which inherently were still irksome for the opposing side. The South received
such provisions in the Compromise of 1850 as a reinforced Fugitive Slave Act,
which would ensure that slaves, when they ran away, would have to be brought
back to their owners even though they had run to abolitionist states where
slavery was illegal.

The North, on the other hand,
received such provisions as the lack of a guarantee of legal slavery south of a
particular border line such as the 35th parallel
north. The Compromise of 1850 also dealt with the issue of whether or not
slavery would be allowed in certain newer southwestern states and it dealt with
how the territory in that area would be divided.  

Atlanta Compromise Revealed Here

Atlanta Compromise Revealed Here

 

The Atlanta Compromise was not a compromise in the same way that many of the other famous compromises throughout American history were compromises. This is because the Atlanta Compromise was actually the name of a speech given by Booker T. Washington in 1895 at the Atlanta Cotton States and International Exposition. 

The Atlanta Compromise thus was not an actual compromise proposed for Congressional legislation or any kind of legal enforcement. 

The name of the Atlanta Compromise was selected by Booker T. Washington himself for the speech. The Atlanta Compromise is considered to have been one of the most important speeches in the history of America.

The Atlanta Compromise speech involved Booker T. Washington touching on a number of different issues with the primary focus on the issue of the treatment of the black population of the South. In his Atlanta Compromise speech, Booker T. Washington focused on the fact that the progress, success, and development of the South depended entirely upon its treatment of its black population, as the black population could either hold the South back from moving forward or it could spur the South into the greatest ranks of progress and success.

Backer T. Washington pointed out in the Atlanta Compromise that the black population should be employed before new immigrants were brought into the country and employed because the black population was already here and willing to work. Furthermore, Booker T. Washington pointed out in the Atlanta Compromise that it was more important for the black population to work fairly and equally now that they have the full range of benefits and treatments afforded to the white population. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact Atlanta lawyers.