Home Agreement

Agreement

Read These Requirements of an Offer

Read These Requirements of an Offer

In order to accurately understand the concept of agreement it is crucial to understand when a valid offer has been made. An offer is made when a party, known as the offeror, presents terms of a contract to another party. The party that receives the offer is known as the offeree. If the offeree accepts the offer, the two parties are considered to be in agreement. 
In contrast to offers are “invitations to treat.” Invitations to treat are not offers. Invitations to treat can happen in a number of ways. Some of the most common include the display of goods in a store window, an auction without reserve, the solicitation of competitive bids, or advertisements for goods.
Except in specific circumstances, an auction does not constitute a legally binding offer and agreement process. An auction can be held with or without reserve. An auction without reserve is the rarer of the two kinds. An action without reserve means that the item will automatically be sold to the highest bidder regardless of the price.
An auction with reserve, or reserve auction, is an auction in which the person putting the item up for auction has stated a price below which they are unwilling to part with the item or circumstances under which they “reserve” the right to not complete the exchange of goods.
Auctions present interesting situations when considering offers and agreements. In an auction without reserve, the person placing the goods up for auction is obligated to accept the final bid. Each bid during the auction represents a new offer. Each higher bid that the auctioneer accepts means that the offer represented by the previous bid is invalidated.
During a reserve auction this can create some complications. If the person placing the goods up for auction decides against accepting the highest bid, they are left without an alternative. Even if the person would rather accept the second highest bid represented, they are unable to do so because the higher bid caused the previous bid to become voidable.
Advertisements are not usually considered to be offers because they may oblige the person creating the advertisement to sell more goods than they possess. As a result, an agreement cannot be reached as the result of an individual responding to an advertisement. Advertisements are technically considered “invitations to treat.” However, there are circumstances in which an advertisement can constitute an offer. 
The Nineteenth Century case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company in England involved a promise by Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to pay £100 to anyone who used their product but still developed influenza, which their product was claimed to prevent. As guarantee of their claim, the advertisement said that the company had deposited £1000 in an account to pay anyone who caught the flu. The advertisement was considered to be a unilateral contract. 
The agreement by Louisa Carlill was twofold. The first part of the agreement can be seen in her purchase of the smoke ball and the second element of agreement was her continued use of the ball. The English Court of Appeals ruled that the advertisement became a legally binding contract on several grounds.
The most relevant part of the ruling was that while an offer existed between the company and the entire world, a contract only existed with those individuals who had taken the actions to accept the terms of the offer. Acceptance in this case is interchangeable with agreement. This case also cemented the idea that conduct was sufficient to convey agreement with the terms of the advertisement’s offer.
Agreements to agree are not considered legally binding. These legal documents only reveal that the concerned parties are considering a future contract. In and of themselves, an agreement to agree does not mandate action on the part of either party. Agreements to agree arise when two parties are discussing an event involving future transactions which are still in progress.
A statement of future intent is not a legally binding contract. It only indicates an agreement by the two parties involved in the negotiation to attempt to form a future contract. An agreement to agree is not binding if the matter under discussion is still in dispute. An agreement to agree may be considered a contract, however, if the material terms of agreement are present. 
Agreements to agree can become legally binding agreements if they contain all the typical elements of a contract. If, however, an agreement to agree merely records the terms that have been discussed in preliminary negotiations or they can be given the full weight of a contract to which both parties have agreed. Agreements to agree are sometimes known as letters of intent. Whether the document is titled an agreement to agree or a letter of intent, the legal significance of the terms is equal.
In order for agreement to occur, the offeree must have an intention to enter into the contract. Intention can be interpreted by action or by verbal acceptance of the terms provided by the offeror. Intention also extends to the offeror. The offeror’s intentions are rarely subject to question. 
Intention to form a contract is one of the requirements to form a contract. Intention to be legally bound by a contract does not exist during the initial negotiation of a contract. Courts generally do not assign intention to either party by their interpretation of the parties’ statements of future intent or by agreements to agree.

100% of Facts About Trade Agreements You Need to Know

100% of Facts About Trade Agreements You Need to Know

A trade agreement is a type of agreement that exists between two or more countries in order to govern the trading procedures that exist between these states. Within the domain of international trade, there are a range of tariffs and prohibitions which limit trade between certain countries.
 
 
Trade agreements can function to counteract these barriers and promote trade between these countries. Limiting trade barriers is advantageous for the United States economy, as it allows for the exportation of more goods. It also helps to benefit participating countries, as the United States can import an increased quantity of goods from these countries, and subsequently sell these goods within the United States. The details of a free trade agreement will vary from one agreement to another. 
 
 
Currently, the United States is engaged in a free trade agreement with a number of different countries. For example, the U.S. has established a free trade agreement with Australia, Jordan, Panama, South Korea, and Singapore, just to name a few.
 
 
Perhaps the most widely known of the existing free trade agreements is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement that exists between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. The initial stages of the agreement occurred between the United States and Canada, and subsequently, Mexico entered into the contract. NAFTA limits the trade barriers that existed between these three countries and encourages open trade.

Quick Overview of The Background of An Agreement

Quick Overview of The Background of An Agreement

An agreement is the second essential step in creating a contract. A formal contract is now recognized by the signing of a contract. In an informal contract, which is a contract when signatures are not exchanged, acceptance is demonstrated by the actions of the two parties. In a bilateral contract, agreement occurs when the two parties accept the obligations placed on them. When a unilateral contract is in effect, agreement occurs when the offeree completes the action requested by the offeror.
The “meeting of the minds” as a standard for recognizing agreement has fallen out of favor due to the recognition that a court cannot assume to know what is within the mind of any individual. As a result, the court cannot possibly interpret the intentions of any party to a contract at the time they enter into the contract.
There are three tests which the courts use to determine if an essential element of a contract is missing. The first standard that the courts have adopted is the “reasonable person test.” The reasonable person test is designed to guard against any agreement which would be detrimental to the person agreeing to the contract. 
When there are elements missing from a contract that is presented before the courts in dispute, the courts employs an “officious bystander test,” which states that terms can be added to a contract in the event that the terms would have been accepted by the parties if only they had been suggested during the negotiations. 
The “business efficacy rule” states that a rule can be implied in the event that it would be included by any reasonable businessman in an attempt to make their businesses run more efficiently. The business efficacy rule only allows the courts to add the simplest terms which would lead to increased efficacy.

Understanding the Terms of Acceptance

Understanding the Terms of Acceptance

If there is a history of contractual relations between the two parties and the offeree does not comment on a proffered contract, their silent acceptance may be inferred from past history. However, a series of contracts must exist for this standard to be applied.
The terms of acceptance, such as requiring that acceptance be faxed or mailed to the offeror, may be laid out in the text of the offer. These are acceptable restrictions that can be placed on conditions of acceptance and are not considered to place an unreasonable burden upon the offeree. The acceptance must be returned in such a way that meets or surpasses the level laid out by the offerror.
If the acceptance is sent through the postal system, it is considered to be in effect as soon as the postage on it has been paid, whether it is delivered to the offeror or not. This is the case because the acceptor fulfilled a reasonable attempt to convey their acceptance. In addition, forcing the acceptor to ensure that the postal service completed delivery of the acceptance is seen as placing an unfair burden on the acceptor. The one exception to this “mailbox rule” is in contracts which specify that the contract is conditional on receipt of acceptance.
The acceptance must be made in a timely manner. If the offer does not give a deadline by which the contract must be accepted, the courts have decreed that the acceptance must still be in a reasonable amount of time. It is impossible for acceptance to be delayed forever.

Find Out the Types of Agreement Here

Find Out the Types of Agreement Here

 

Subcontractor Agreement vs. Contractor Agreement

A contractor agreement is a written agreement that exists between a company and a contractor hired by that company to complete specified tasks. A subcontractor agreement exists between a contractor and a subcontractor, who the contractor hires to complete the tasks outlined in an existing contractor agreement. 

Non-Compete Agreement

A non-compete agreement is a written contract created by an employer and signed by an employee. When an individual begins employment with a company, he/she may be required to sign this type of agreement. Subsequently he/she will be prohibited from acquiring employment with a competing company or a similar company for a specified period of time. 

LLC Operating Agreement

When a group of individuals chooses to create and operate a Limited Liability Company (LLC), it is vital that they develop an LLC Operating Agreement. This is an agreement between all members involved in the company which details all pertinent information. An individual can locate an LLC Operating Agreement template online to help him/her develop an Operating Agreement. 

Cohabitation Agreement

When two individuals decide to live together, they should consider creating a cohabitation agreement. A cohabitation agreement is a legally binding contract that outlines the personal and financial responsibilities of each party. In addition, it addresses how assets will be divided in the event that the couple decides to separate. 

Trade Agreements

Trade agreements are contracts that exist between at least two countries in order to govern and regulate trade between these countries. The United States has established an individual free trade agreement with numerous different countries. These agreements act to reduce the existing trade barriers and promote trade.

 

Important Details on Service Level Agreement

Important Details on Service Level Agreement

Contract Law Context for Service Level Agreements
 
 
A service level agreement (SLA) is a kind of contract which sets the understood and legally bearing conditions, or level, for a certain specific kind of commercially offered and accessed service.
 
 
As with other kinds of contracts also passed in the commercial and business world, a service level agreement will necessarily involve at least two entities signatory to the contract and thus subject to its provisions, thereby establishing a legal relationship, as could be further used, upon claimed instances of violation or illegal modification thereof, to furnish the grounds for a process of civil litigation transacted in the U.S. legal system. 
 
 
Identifying Service Level Agreements
 
 
A service level agreement must necessarily be identified in order for the correct application of U.S. contract law, in terms of those contracts passed which specifically designate one party to the document as being the customer and the other as being the entity furnishing a particular service to that customer. A third party contract, necessarily, is thus precluded from the language considered as applying to service level agreements. 
 
 
Subjects for Service Level Agreements
 
 
Some of the functions which might be covered under service level agreements can be expected to comprise categories such as:
 
 
    Priority
 
 
    Obligation
 
 
    Guarantee
 
 
    Warranty
 
 
Different Service Level Agreement Types
 
 
A service level agreement might potentially comprise customer-based, service-based, multi-level, corporate-level, customer-level, and service-level service level agreements, as legal measures commonly applicable in such cases. 

Don’t Miss These Important Facts on Executive Agreement

Don't Miss These Important Facts on Executive Agreement

Legal Context for Executive Agreements
 
 
Despite the name, an executive agreement is not meaningfully an aspect of contract law, at least according to the terms and conditions through which this legal category is usually understood, but rather of Constitutional law. More specifically, the “executive agreement” concept in U.S. law pertains to such varied matters as the ability to exercise control over the foreign policy of the country; more specifically in terms of its relationship to other nations through treaties and other documents and mechanisms and to the separation of powers between the different branches of the Federal U.S. Government.
 
 
This last concept constitutes a primary consideration undertaken by the U.S. Constitution, and accordingly applicable to the theories and debates as continue to this day, over the application of the United States’ foundational and essential, yet broad and ambiguous, document. 
 
 
Application of Executive Agreements in U.S. Law
 
 
To further illuminate these points, it might be noted that an executive agreement is a treaty passed by the President of the United States with the government of another national jurisdiction and without the consent of the legislature of the United States. Presidents are said to have used the so-called “discretion” vested in their office when they make the determination of enacting an executive agreement and thus bypassing the necessity of relying upon the power of Congress. Moreover, an executive agreement could applicably be contrasted with a legislative-executive agreement. 

Quick Overview to LLC Operating Agreement

Quick Overview to LLC Operating Agreement

In order to understand what an LLC Operating Agreement is and its function, it is first important to understand what an LLC is. LLC stands for Limited Liability Company. A Limited Liability Company is a business entity that maintains a number of features unique from other business organizations. 
For example, an LLC combines features possessed by small partnerships and large corporations. In an LLC, the owner or owners of the company maintain limited liability if the company falls into debt. In addition, an LLC does not face the taxation experienced by corporations. These features make Limited Liability Companies attractive to potential business owners.
In order to create and operate an LLC in the United States, participating members must create an LLC Operating Agreement. If an LLC fails to create an LLC Operating Agreement, it will be held to the rules and regulations outlined by the state. 
An LLC Operating Agreement outlines the rights, managerial duties, and financial responsibilities of all members involved in the creation and operation of an LLC. When a group of individuals chooses to establish an LLC, it should create an LLC Operating Agreement. 
An LLC Operating Agreement template can be located online. This template will help an individual to determine what information to include within the agreement. Some features that should be addressed include the responsibilities of each member, the rights of each member, the interest percentages of each member, and how all losses or gains are to be allocated. In addition, the Operating Agreement should cover voting procedures, management techniques, and buyout regulations. 

How To Terminate An Offer

How To Terminate An Offer

There are several circumstances under which an agreement or an offer may be terminated. The first way to terminate an offer is to attempt to change the offer. Any attempt to change an offer is known as a counter-offer. A counter-offer is a termination of an offer by the offeree. If a counter-offer is presented and subsequently rejected, the execution of the original offer cannot be compelled by a court of law. Unless the counter-offer contains a provision specifically authorizing it, any previous offer becomes invalidated.
 
 
An offeror may terminate an offer if the offer contains a time period during which the offer must be accepted. If the offer does not contain a time period after which the offer becomes invalidated, then the courts commonly hold that the offer is invalid after a "reasonable" amount of time, but never specifically states what that time period is. In the event an offeror rescinds the period of time for which they had previously agreed to keep an offer open, the offeree can sue for breach of contract.
 
 
Contract negotiations are often lengthy processes. If during the negotiations one of the parties discovers that the information being discussed in the negotiations is substantively different than as presented during the negotiation process but fails to disclose this information, it may serve as grounds to invalidate the other party's agreement.

Rental Agreement vs. Lease Agreement

Rental Agreement vs. Lease AgreementWhen an individual is searching
for an apartment to rent, it is important that he/she understands the
difference between a rental and lease agreement. Understanding the way in which
an individual’s contract operates is a vital aspect of renting or leasing property.



Though the terms rental
agreement and lease agreement are frequently used interchangeably, it is
important to note the various differences that exist between these two types of
contracts. The type of contract that an individual enters into will determine
the responsibilities and the rights that he/she possesses while he/she is held
to this contract. 


In addition, these contracts range in regard to the
responsibilities and rights maintained by the landlord who is renting property
to a tenant.


A lease agreement is a type of contract that
regulates the relationship between tenants and landlords. A lease agreement
will last for a specified duration of time. In many instances, this period
lasts for one year, though this may vary substantially. While the contract is
active, both parties are required to adhere to all conditions detailed in the
contract. No alterations can be made to the contract while the contract is
active. Therefore, a landlord cannot choose to increase the cost of rent.


The conditions associated with rental
agreements are slightly different. For example, these contracts function as
month-to-month contracts. Every month, a tenant can choose to renew his/her
rental agreement or leave the property. In addition, once the month ends, alterations
can be made to the rental contract. Therefore, a landlord may decide to
increase the cost of rent at the end of every month.


Both rental and lease
agreements have beneficial and disadvantageous features.

Attorneys, Get Listed

X