Facebook
Home Agreement

Agreement

Important Details on Service Level Agreement

Important Details on Service Level Agreement

Contract Law Context for Service Level Agreements
 
 
A service level agreement (SLA) is a kind of contract which sets the understood and legally bearing conditions, or level, for a certain specific kind of commercially offered and accessed service.
 
 
As with other kinds of contracts also passed in the commercial and business world, a service level agreement will necessarily involve at least two entities signatory to the contract and thus subject to its provisions, thereby establishing a legal relationship, as could be further used, upon claimed instances of violation or illegal modification thereof, to furnish the grounds for a process of civil litigation transacted in the U.S. legal system. 
 
 
Identifying Service Level Agreements
 
 
A service level agreement must necessarily be identified in order for the correct application of U.S. contract law, in terms of those contracts passed which specifically designate one party to the document as being the customer and the other as being the entity furnishing a particular service to that customer. A third party contract, necessarily, is thus precluded from the language considered as applying to service level agreements. 
 
 
Subjects for Service Level Agreements
 
 
Some of the functions which might be covered under service level agreements can be expected to comprise categories such as:
 
 
    Priority
 
 
    Obligation
 
 
    Guarantee
 
 
    Warranty
 
 
Different Service Level Agreement Types
 
 
A service level agreement might potentially comprise customer-based, service-based, multi-level, corporate-level, customer-level, and service-level service level agreements, as legal measures commonly applicable in such cases. 

Option Contracts Explained

Option Contracts Explained

Option contracts are contracts in which the offeror, or promisor, is limited in their ability to withdraw or rescind a contract. An option contract is an important element of a unilateral contract. Traditionally a unilateral contract is only formed when the action under consideration is completed. This is an issue because it provides no protection to an offeree who has completed the partial performance of the contracted action before the offeror withdraws the contract under discussion. 
An option contract transforms a unilateral contract into a bilateral one because it provides some guarantee to any party providing agreement to the contract that their actions will receive compensation. The compensation may begin immediately after the action is begun or may only come into effect once a significant portion of the work is completed. The party which has engaged an action leading to the partial performance of the contract may be able to claim detrimental reliance upon the belief that the offeror would provide payment.
For instance, Mike hired Steve to paint the walls and ceiling of his room for $100. Mike told Steve to leave after Steve had finished painting the four walls and was in the middle of painting the ceiling.
Under a traditional unilateral contract, Steve would not be entitled to any of the $100 because the money was provided as consideration for the completion of the task. Steve, however, could compel Mike through promissory estoppel to compensate him for the partial performance of the task. Steve undertook the actions under a detrimental reliance that Mike would allow him to complete to task.
Option contracts are usually found in real estate. Real estate option contracts exist primarily for the benefit of the buyer. The buyer in a real estate option contract is allowed time to secure financing, to arrange for a contractor to examine the land, and to investigate relevant zoning laws governing the property.
Real estate option contracts do not oblige the buyer to grant agreement to the seller’s offer. Agreement in real estate contracts can be withheld by a buyer looking to make money off the land. Real estate option contracts often have a short period of time before the terms laid out in the contract lapse.

Quick Outline of the Marital Settlement Agreement

Quick Outline of the Marital Settlement Agreement

Legal Context for Marital Settlement Agreements
A Marital Settlement Agreement is a kind of contract which can be drawn up by the two primary parties to the legal action of a marital divorce, as provides for the settlement of the various rights, privileges, and responsibilities held by the two individuals without the necessity of further litigation or adjudication.
U.S. divorce laws are, for the most part, formulated and carried out on a state-by-state basis. Thus, the particular Marital Settlement Agreement drawn up in reference to a particular marriage should refer to the applicable laws of that specific jurisdiction and provide against the possibility of provisions which cannot legally go into effect in that particular state.
 
Subjects for a Marital Settlement Agreement
A Marital Settlement Agreement, as will generally be entered into with the assistance of legal counsel separately retained by both of the parties to the divorce, can most effectively proceed by providing for all of the potentially legally relevant aspects of the legal relationship between the two individuals.
 
Function of Marital Settlement Agreement
A Marital Settlement Agreement does not itself provide for the legal effectiveness of the severing of the legal relationship between the two parties signatory to the contract in the form of a divorce, nor does it enact the initiation of the legal process of the court considering and potentially approving the rightness of such a legal motion. Often Marital Settlement contracts are drawn up as preambles to entering into an amicable divorce.

100% of Facts About Trade Agreements You Need to Know

100% of Facts About Trade Agreements You Need to Know

A trade agreement is a type of agreement that exists between two or more countries in order to govern the trading procedures that exist between these states. Within the domain of international trade, there are a range of tariffs and prohibitions which limit trade between certain countries.
 
 
Trade agreements can function to counteract these barriers and promote trade between these countries. Limiting trade barriers is advantageous for the United States economy, as it allows for the exportation of more goods. It also helps to benefit participating countries, as the United States can import an increased quantity of goods from these countries, and subsequently sell these goods within the United States. The details of a free trade agreement will vary from one agreement to another. 
 
 
Currently, the United States is engaged in a free trade agreement with a number of different countries. For example, the U.S. has established a free trade agreement with Australia, Jordan, Panama, South Korea, and Singapore, just to name a few.
 
 
Perhaps the most widely known of the existing free trade agreements is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement that exists between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. The initial stages of the agreement occurred between the United States and Canada, and subsequently, Mexico entered into the contract. NAFTA limits the trade barriers that existed between these three countries and encourages open trade.

Understanding the Terms of Acceptance

Understanding the Terms of Acceptance

If there is a history of contractual relations between the two parties and the offeree does not comment on a proffered contract, their silent acceptance may be inferred from past history. However, a series of contracts must exist for this standard to be applied.
The terms of acceptance, such as requiring that acceptance be faxed or mailed to the offeror, may be laid out in the text of the offer. These are acceptable restrictions that can be placed on conditions of acceptance and are not considered to place an unreasonable burden upon the offeree. The acceptance must be returned in such a way that meets or surpasses the level laid out by the offerror.
If the acceptance is sent through the postal system, it is considered to be in effect as soon as the postage on it has been paid, whether it is delivered to the offeror or not. This is the case because the acceptor fulfilled a reasonable attempt to convey their acceptance. In addition, forcing the acceptor to ensure that the postal service completed delivery of the acceptance is seen as placing an unfair burden on the acceptor. The one exception to this “mailbox rule” is in contracts which specify that the contract is conditional on receipt of acceptance.
The acceptance must be made in a timely manner. If the offer does not give a deadline by which the contract must be accepted, the courts have decreed that the acceptance must still be in a reasonable amount of time. It is impossible for acceptance to be delayed forever.

Quick Overview on the Credit Agreement

Quick Overview on the Credit Agreement

Definition of a Credit Agreement

As a commonly applicable feature and function of U.S. contract law, a credit agreement can be expected to comprise of the contract drawn up between a bank, or financial institution of comparable resources and functions, and another legal entity designated as the recipient of a financial loan from that institution. As such, credit agreements are allowed for under U.S. contract law, as well as the contract laws used in other legal jurisdictions, in order to allow for the availability of credit issued to individuals and organizations. 


Provisions of a Credit Agreement
As with other kinds of contracts also put into effect in a commercial or financial context, a credit agreement can be expected to establish the legally binding conditions which will govern the functions allowed for or prohibited between the two parties to the contract, as comprise in this case of the bank furnishing the loan and the individual or organization accepting that loan. Perhaps most importantly, the interest charged on the loan will generally be affixed through the provisions set forth in the credit agreement.
The composition of a credit agreement might further function toward specifying the point, if any, when the loan must be repaid in full to the lending bank and thus when the legal relationship between the bank and loan recipient will come to an end, though often this will not be found to apply. 

Potential Settings for Credit Agreements
Credit cards and mortgages are some of the financial instruments potentially subject to credit agreements. 

Termination by Law At A Glance

Termination by Law At A Glance

There are several ways in which an offer can be terminated. The first way to terminate an irrevocable offer is for the offerree to reject the offer, either by denying it or by presenting a counter-offer. The second way is for a period of time laid out in the original offer to expire. If the offer states that it must be accepted by a certain time, but it is not, then the offer to provide agreement to the contract is considered terminated.

An irrevocable offer, or any other offer for that matter, can also become unenforceable in several other circumstances. If the party which offered the contract dies or becomes legally barred from entering into a contract, for instance due to mental incompetence, it will be deemed unenforceable. A contract can become void if a law is passed that would cause the contract to be contrary to statute. 

Quick Overview of The Background of An Agreement

Quick Overview of The Background of An Agreement

An agreement is the second essential step in creating a contract. A formal contract is now recognized by the signing of a contract. In an informal contract, which is a contract when signatures are not exchanged, acceptance is demonstrated by the actions of the two parties. In a bilateral contract, agreement occurs when the two parties accept the obligations placed on them. When a unilateral contract is in effect, agreement occurs when the offeree completes the action requested by the offeror.
The “meeting of the minds” as a standard for recognizing agreement has fallen out of favor due to the recognition that a court cannot assume to know what is within the mind of any individual. As a result, the court cannot possibly interpret the intentions of any party to a contract at the time they enter into the contract.
There are three tests which the courts use to determine if an essential element of a contract is missing. The first standard that the courts have adopted is the “reasonable person test.” The reasonable person test is designed to guard against any agreement which would be detrimental to the person agreeing to the contract. 
When there are elements missing from a contract that is presented before the courts in dispute, the courts employs an “officious bystander test,” which states that terms can be added to a contract in the event that the terms would have been accepted by the parties if only they had been suggested during the negotiations. 
The “business efficacy rule” states that a rule can be implied in the event that it would be included by any reasonable businessman in an attempt to make their businesses run more efficiently. The business efficacy rule only allows the courts to add the simplest terms which would lead to increased efficacy.

Find Out the Types of Agreement Here

Find Out the Types of Agreement Here

 

Subcontractor Agreement vs. Contractor Agreement

A contractor agreement is a written agreement that exists between a company and a contractor hired by that company to complete specified tasks. A subcontractor agreement exists between a contractor and a subcontractor, who the contractor hires to complete the tasks outlined in an existing contractor agreement. 

Non-Compete Agreement

A non-compete agreement is a written contract created by an employer and signed by an employee. When an individual begins employment with a company, he/she may be required to sign this type of agreement. Subsequently he/she will be prohibited from acquiring employment with a competing company or a similar company for a specified period of time. 

LLC Operating Agreement

When a group of individuals chooses to create and operate a Limited Liability Company (LLC), it is vital that they develop an LLC Operating Agreement. This is an agreement between all members involved in the company which details all pertinent information. An individual can locate an LLC Operating Agreement template online to help him/her develop an Operating Agreement. 

Cohabitation Agreement

When two individuals decide to live together, they should consider creating a cohabitation agreement. A cohabitation agreement is a legally binding contract that outlines the personal and financial responsibilities of each party. In addition, it addresses how assets will be divided in the event that the couple decides to separate. 

Trade Agreements

Trade agreements are contracts that exist between at least two countries in order to govern and regulate trade between these countries. The United States has established an individual free trade agreement with numerous different countries. These agreements act to reduce the existing trade barriers and promote trade.

 

Don’t Miss These Important Facts on Executive Agreement

Don't Miss These Important Facts on Executive Agreement

Legal Context for Executive Agreements
 
 
Despite the name, an executive agreement is not meaningfully an aspect of contract law, at least according to the terms and conditions through which this legal category is usually understood, but rather of Constitutional law. More specifically, the “executive agreement” concept in U.S. law pertains to such varied matters as the ability to exercise control over the foreign policy of the country; more specifically in terms of its relationship to other nations through treaties and other documents and mechanisms and to the separation of powers between the different branches of the Federal U.S. Government.
 
 
This last concept constitutes a primary consideration undertaken by the U.S. Constitution, and accordingly applicable to the theories and debates as continue to this day, over the application of the United States’ foundational and essential, yet broad and ambiguous, document. 
 
 
Application of Executive Agreements in U.S. Law
 
 
To further illuminate these points, it might be noted that an executive agreement is a treaty passed by the President of the United States with the government of another national jurisdiction and without the consent of the legislature of the United States. Presidents are said to have used the so-called “discretion” vested in their office when they make the determination of enacting an executive agreement and thus bypassing the necessity of relying upon the power of Congress. Moreover, an executive agreement could applicably be contrasted with a legislative-executive agreement. 
12Page 1 of 2
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X