Facebook
Home Agreement

Agreement

Must Know Facts About Tenancy Agreement

Must Know Facts About Tenancy Agreement

Contract Laws on Tenancy Agreements
As a subset of U.S. contract law, a tenancy agreement can be expected to comprise the document through which the legal relationship between a landlord and his or her tenant is established. As with other kinds of contracts, tenancy agreements typically pertain to the conditions agreed to and entered into on the part of both of the signatory and named parties to the contract.
More specifically, a tenancy agreement entered into on the part of both parties in the U.S. or another comparable and similarly-functioning legal jurisdiction and system can and should be expected to answer the questions “who?,” “what?,” “when?,” and “how much?”. 

Tenancy Agreements as Forms of Leases
A tenancy agreement could be considered a kind of lease, and indeed it will often be referred to with this term. In the U.S. and other legal systems considered to come under the overall heading of so-called “civil law,” a tenancy agreement, or any other form of lease alternately entered into by a property owner and prospective property user, must include the specified and necessary element of rent payable on the part of the contracting individual to the property owner.
Tenancy agreements can be understood as potentially differing from other kinds of leases, as might be alternately entered into, in terms of being for expressly residential purposes. As such, the parties signing a tenancy agreement will typically be landlord and tenant. A tenancy agreement might also variously come in such forms as fixed, periodic and indefinite leases.
 

Understanding the Terms of Acceptance

Understanding the Terms of Acceptance

If there is a history of contractual relations between the two parties and the offeree does not comment on a proffered contract, their silent acceptance may be inferred from past history. However, a series of contracts must exist for this standard to be applied.
The terms of acceptance, such as requiring that acceptance be faxed or mailed to the offeror, may be laid out in the text of the offer. These are acceptable restrictions that can be placed on conditions of acceptance and are not considered to place an unreasonable burden upon the offeree. The acceptance must be returned in such a way that meets or surpasses the level laid out by the offerror.
If the acceptance is sent through the postal system, it is considered to be in effect as soon as the postage on it has been paid, whether it is delivered to the offeror or not. This is the case because the acceptor fulfilled a reasonable attempt to convey their acceptance. In addition, forcing the acceptor to ensure that the postal service completed delivery of the acceptance is seen as placing an unfair burden on the acceptor. The one exception to this “mailbox rule” is in contracts which specify that the contract is conditional on receipt of acceptance.
The acceptance must be made in a timely manner. If the offer does not give a deadline by which the contract must be accepted, the courts have decreed that the acceptance must still be in a reasonable amount of time. It is impossible for acceptance to be delayed forever.

Quick Overview on the Credit Agreement

Quick Overview on the Credit Agreement

Definition of a Credit Agreement

As a commonly applicable feature and function of U.S. contract law, a credit agreement can be expected to comprise of the contract drawn up between a bank, or financial institution of comparable resources and functions, and another legal entity designated as the recipient of a financial loan from that institution. As such, credit agreements are allowed for under U.S. contract law, as well as the contract laws used in other legal jurisdictions, in order to allow for the availability of credit issued to individuals and organizations. 


Provisions of a Credit Agreement
As with other kinds of contracts also put into effect in a commercial or financial context, a credit agreement can be expected to establish the legally binding conditions which will govern the functions allowed for or prohibited between the two parties to the contract, as comprise in this case of the bank furnishing the loan and the individual or organization accepting that loan. Perhaps most importantly, the interest charged on the loan will generally be affixed through the provisions set forth in the credit agreement.
The composition of a credit agreement might further function toward specifying the point, if any, when the loan must be repaid in full to the lending bank and thus when the legal relationship between the bank and loan recipient will come to an end, though often this will not be found to apply. 

Potential Settings for Credit Agreements
Credit cards and mortgages are some of the financial instruments potentially subject to credit agreements. 

How To Terminate An Offer

How To Terminate An Offer

There are several circumstances under which an agreement or an offer may be terminated. The first way to terminate an offer is to attempt to change the offer. Any attempt to change an offer is known as a counter-offer. A counter-offer is a termination of an offer by the offeree. If a counter-offer is presented and subsequently rejected, the execution of the original offer cannot be compelled by a court of law. Unless the counter-offer contains a provision specifically authorizing it, any previous offer becomes invalidated.
 
 
An offeror may terminate an offer if the offer contains a time period during which the offer must be accepted. If the offer does not contain a time period after which the offer becomes invalidated, then the courts commonly hold that the offer is invalid after a "reasonable" amount of time, but never specifically states what that time period is. In the event an offeror rescinds the period of time for which they had previously agreed to keep an offer open, the offeree can sue for breach of contract.
 
 
Contract negotiations are often lengthy processes. If during the negotiations one of the parties discovers that the information being discussed in the negotiations is substantively different than as presented during the negotiation process but fails to disclose this information, it may serve as grounds to invalidate the other party's agreement.

Quick Overview to LLC Operating Agreement

Quick Overview to LLC Operating Agreement

In order to understand what an LLC Operating Agreement is and its function, it is first important to understand what an LLC is. LLC stands for Limited Liability Company. A Limited Liability Company is a business entity that maintains a number of features unique from other business organizations. 
For example, an LLC combines features possessed by small partnerships and large corporations. In an LLC, the owner or owners of the company maintain limited liability if the company falls into debt. In addition, an LLC does not face the taxation experienced by corporations. These features make Limited Liability Companies attractive to potential business owners.
In order to create and operate an LLC in the United States, participating members must create an LLC Operating Agreement. If an LLC fails to create an LLC Operating Agreement, it will be held to the rules and regulations outlined by the state. 
An LLC Operating Agreement outlines the rights, managerial duties, and financial responsibilities of all members involved in the creation and operation of an LLC. When a group of individuals chooses to establish an LLC, it should create an LLC Operating Agreement. 
An LLC Operating Agreement template can be located online. This template will help an individual to determine what information to include within the agreement. Some features that should be addressed include the responsibilities of each member, the rights of each member, the interest percentages of each member, and how all losses or gains are to be allocated. In addition, the Operating Agreement should cover voting procedures, management techniques, and buyout regulations. 

Read These Requirements of an Offer

Read These Requirements of an Offer

In order to accurately understand the concept of agreement it is crucial to understand when a valid offer has been made. An offer is made when a party, known as the offeror, presents terms of a contract to another party. The party that receives the offer is known as the offeree. If the offeree accepts the offer, the two parties are considered to be in agreement. 
In contrast to offers are “invitations to treat.” Invitations to treat are not offers. Invitations to treat can happen in a number of ways. Some of the most common include the display of goods in a store window, an auction without reserve, the solicitation of competitive bids, or advertisements for goods.
Except in specific circumstances, an auction does not constitute a legally binding offer and agreement process. An auction can be held with or without reserve. An auction without reserve is the rarer of the two kinds. An action without reserve means that the item will automatically be sold to the highest bidder regardless of the price.
An auction with reserve, or reserve auction, is an auction in which the person putting the item up for auction has stated a price below which they are unwilling to part with the item or circumstances under which they “reserve” the right to not complete the exchange of goods.
Auctions present interesting situations when considering offers and agreements. In an auction without reserve, the person placing the goods up for auction is obligated to accept the final bid. Each bid during the auction represents a new offer. Each higher bid that the auctioneer accepts means that the offer represented by the previous bid is invalidated.
During a reserve auction this can create some complications. If the person placing the goods up for auction decides against accepting the highest bid, they are left without an alternative. Even if the person would rather accept the second highest bid represented, they are unable to do so because the higher bid caused the previous bid to become voidable.
Advertisements are not usually considered to be offers because they may oblige the person creating the advertisement to sell more goods than they possess. As a result, an agreement cannot be reached as the result of an individual responding to an advertisement. Advertisements are technically considered “invitations to treat.” However, there are circumstances in which an advertisement can constitute an offer. 
The Nineteenth Century case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company in England involved a promise by Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to pay £100 to anyone who used their product but still developed influenza, which their product was claimed to prevent. As guarantee of their claim, the advertisement said that the company had deposited £1000 in an account to pay anyone who caught the flu. The advertisement was considered to be a unilateral contract. 
The agreement by Louisa Carlill was twofold. The first part of the agreement can be seen in her purchase of the smoke ball and the second element of agreement was her continued use of the ball. The English Court of Appeals ruled that the advertisement became a legally binding contract on several grounds.
The most relevant part of the ruling was that while an offer existed between the company and the entire world, a contract only existed with those individuals who had taken the actions to accept the terms of the offer. Acceptance in this case is interchangeable with agreement. This case also cemented the idea that conduct was sufficient to convey agreement with the terms of the advertisement’s offer.
Agreements to agree are not considered legally binding. These legal documents only reveal that the concerned parties are considering a future contract. In and of themselves, an agreement to agree does not mandate action on the part of either party. Agreements to agree arise when two parties are discussing an event involving future transactions which are still in progress.
A statement of future intent is not a legally binding contract. It only indicates an agreement by the two parties involved in the negotiation to attempt to form a future contract. An agreement to agree is not binding if the matter under discussion is still in dispute. An agreement to agree may be considered a contract, however, if the material terms of agreement are present. 
Agreements to agree can become legally binding agreements if they contain all the typical elements of a contract. If, however, an agreement to agree merely records the terms that have been discussed in preliminary negotiations or they can be given the full weight of a contract to which both parties have agreed. Agreements to agree are sometimes known as letters of intent. Whether the document is titled an agreement to agree or a letter of intent, the legal significance of the terms is equal.
In order for agreement to occur, the offeree must have an intention to enter into the contract. Intention can be interpreted by action or by verbal acceptance of the terms provided by the offeror. Intention also extends to the offeror. The offeror’s intentions are rarely subject to question. 
Intention to form a contract is one of the requirements to form a contract. Intention to be legally bound by a contract does not exist during the initial negotiation of a contract. Courts generally do not assign intention to either party by their interpretation of the parties’ statements of future intent or by agreements to agree.

Termination by Law At A Glance

Termination by Law At A Glance

There are several ways in which an offer can be terminated. The first way to terminate an irrevocable offer is for the offerree to reject the offer, either by denying it or by presenting a counter-offer. The second way is for a period of time laid out in the original offer to expire. If the offer states that it must be accepted by a certain time, but it is not, then the offer to provide agreement to the contract is considered terminated.

An irrevocable offer, or any other offer for that matter, can also become unenforceable in several other circumstances. If the party which offered the contract dies or becomes legally barred from entering into a contract, for instance due to mental incompetence, it will be deemed unenforceable. A contract can become void if a law is passed that would cause the contract to be contrary to statute. 

Quick Outline of the Marital Settlement Agreement

Quick Outline of the Marital Settlement Agreement

Legal Context for Marital Settlement Agreements
A Marital Settlement Agreement is a kind of contract which can be drawn up by the two primary parties to the legal action of a marital divorce, as provides for the settlement of the various rights, privileges, and responsibilities held by the two individuals without the necessity of further litigation or adjudication.
U.S. divorce laws are, for the most part, formulated and carried out on a state-by-state basis. Thus, the particular Marital Settlement Agreement drawn up in reference to a particular marriage should refer to the applicable laws of that specific jurisdiction and provide against the possibility of provisions which cannot legally go into effect in that particular state.
 
Subjects for a Marital Settlement Agreement
A Marital Settlement Agreement, as will generally be entered into with the assistance of legal counsel separately retained by both of the parties to the divorce, can most effectively proceed by providing for all of the potentially legally relevant aspects of the legal relationship between the two individuals.
 
Function of Marital Settlement Agreement
A Marital Settlement Agreement does not itself provide for the legal effectiveness of the severing of the legal relationship between the two parties signatory to the contract in the form of a divorce, nor does it enact the initiation of the legal process of the court considering and potentially approving the rightness of such a legal motion. Often Marital Settlement contracts are drawn up as preambles to entering into an amicable divorce.

What You Didn’t Know About Non Compete Agreement

What You Didn't Know About Non Compete Agreement

A non-compete agreement is a type of agreement contract created by employers, which prohibits employees from being employed by competitors or similar companies. Prior to working for a company, an individual may be required to sign a non-compete agreement. 
This agreement will usually outline how long the agreement lasts and to what geographical location the agreement applies. After an individual signs a non-compete agreement, he/she will not be permitted to work for competitors of the company.
There has been an extensive amount of debate surrounding non-compete agreements. For example, it prohibits an individual from seeking employment in a field that he/she has experience in, thereby significantly limiting his/her employment opportunities. These agreements are also very difficult to enforce. 
An employer would need to know where his/her past employees were seeking employment, and subsequently take the legal action necessary to prevent them from being employed in these locations.
Despite the many concerns regarding non-compete agreements and the flaws associated with this type of contract, there are practical reasons for using them. For example, some companies maintain confidential client lists to which employees have access. In addition to these customer lists, employees also have access to marketing strategies, new products, and additional confidential information. If a former employee chooses to acquire employment with a competitor, he/she may reveal this information, thereby adversely impacting a company.
A non-compete agreement is considered to be a legally binding contract, as long as the conditions outlined within the agreement are reasonable. 

100% of Facts About Trade Agreements You Need to Know

100% of Facts About Trade Agreements You Need to Know

A trade agreement is a type of agreement that exists between two or more countries in order to govern the trading procedures that exist between these states. Within the domain of international trade, there are a range of tariffs and prohibitions which limit trade between certain countries.
 
 
Trade agreements can function to counteract these barriers and promote trade between these countries. Limiting trade barriers is advantageous for the United States economy, as it allows for the exportation of more goods. It also helps to benefit participating countries, as the United States can import an increased quantity of goods from these countries, and subsequently sell these goods within the United States. The details of a free trade agreement will vary from one agreement to another. 
 
 
Currently, the United States is engaged in a free trade agreement with a number of different countries. For example, the U.S. has established a free trade agreement with Australia, Jordan, Panama, South Korea, and Singapore, just to name a few.
 
 
Perhaps the most widely known of the existing free trade agreements is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement that exists between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. The initial stages of the agreement occurred between the United States and Canada, and subsequently, Mexico entered into the contract. NAFTA limits the trade barriers that existed between these three countries and encourages open trade.
12Page 1 of 2
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
Facebook
©

Attorneys, Get Listed

Free Coupon
X